The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Research on Trace Minerals in the Common Bean
Open accessAbstract
The common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the most important grain legume for direct human consumption, being especially important in eastern Africa and in Latin America. The objective of the Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) in participating in the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) Micronutrients Project has been to assess the feasibility of improving common beans for micronutrient content, especially iron and zinc. In the evaluation of more than a thousand accessions in the cultivated core collection, a mean iron concentration of 55 mg/kg was found, with a range of 34 to 89 mg/kg. Zinc concentrations ranged between 21 and 54 mg/kg, with an average value of 35 mg/kg. These initial data suggest that sufficient genetic variability exists to improve iron content by about 80% and zinc content by about 50%. An essential question for the improvement of any trait through plant-breeding is the degree to which the trait is stable across environments. Genetic differences have been expressed over environments and seasons, offering good prospects that genotypes selected in one environment for high iron or zinc will express superior levels of minerals in other environments as well. Correlations among mineral concentrations suggest that the improvement of one mineral may simultaneously improve the contents of other minerals, thus multiplying the impact of the effort. The fact that the bioavailability of iron was higher in white beans in rat studies suggests that a lower tannin content could be beneficial, but the role of tannin is still not well elucidated. The genetics of iron and zinc content appears to be complex, involving between 7 and 11 loci.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
White, P. J., & Broadley, M. R. (2009) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02738.x · Cited by 2,178
Singh, N. (2017) · Journal of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13197-017-2537-4 · Cited by 290
Can We Improve the Nutritional Quality of Legume Seeds?
Wang, T. L., Domoney, C., Hedley, C. L., Casey, R., & Grusak, M. A. (2003) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.102.017665 · Cited by 263
Anitha, L., Sai Bramari, G., & Kalpana, P. (2016) · Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology · doi:10.4236/abb.2016.76027 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Beebe, S., Gonzalez, A. V., & Rengifo, J.
- Venue
- Food and Nutrition Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 387-391
- ISSN
- 0379-5721 (ISSN-L)
- 1564-8265
- OpenAlex
- W2267291107
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Research on Trace Minerals in the Common Bean. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/156482650002100408
- The paper
- Beebe, S., Gonzalez, A. V., & Rengifo, J. (2000). Research on Trace Minerals in the Common Bean. Food and Nutrition Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/156482650002100408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.