Cited by 290Food and Agricultural SciencesFood composition and propertiesConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Pulses: An Overview

Open access
Singh, Narpinder·2017·Journal of Food Science and Technology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13197-017-2537-4

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In both muffins and crackers, protein synergy between Spirulina and pulse flours can improve lysine content, since the high lysine and folate levels in pulses make them particularly suitable for inclusion in composite flours with cereals.

    “In both products, protein synergy between Spirulina and pulse flours can improve lysine content, since the high lysine and folate levels in pulses make them particularly suitable for inclusion in composite flours with cereals [119].”

    From Valorization of Microalgae as Multifunctional Protein Sources in Plant-Based Systems: Structural, Functional, and Processing Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as [119]

    The ‘Pulses: an overview’ section says that pulses’ high lysine and folate content makes them suitable for composite flours with cereals. It does not address Spirulina–pulse protein synergy or show improved lysine content in muffins or crackers; a search for those terms found no supporting passage. Page numbers were not available for the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hosfield GL, Uebersax MA, Occena LG (2000) Technological and genetic improvements in dry bean quality and utilization. In: Proceedings of the Idaho Bean Workshop, University of Idaho, Moscow, 135-152
  2. Singh N (2010) Physico-chemical and functional properties of pulse starch. In: Tiwari B, Gowen A, McKenna B (eds) Pulse foods: quality, technology, and nutraceutical application. Elsevier, Amsterdam

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, N.
Affiliations
Guru Nanak Dev University (IN)
Corresponding author
Singh, Narpinder
Venue
Journal of Food Science and Technology
Published
2017-02-14
Volume
54
Issue
4
Pages
853-857
ISSN
  • 0022-1155 (ISSN-L)
  • 0975-8402
OpenAlex
W2587854367
Cited by
290
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4
FWCI
10.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
pulses, Fabaceae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review