Cited by 61Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsCross-Cultural and Social AnalysisAnthropology: Ethics, History, Culture

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cultural Insiders and Research Fieldwork: Case Examples From Cross-Cultural Research With Thai People

Open access
Suwankhong, Dusanee, Liamputtong, Pranee·2015·International Journal of Qualitative Methods

Abstract

The status of the insider and outsider is an important concept for cross-cultural research. Being a cultural insider is recognized as a strength that allows the researcher to take part in the everyday lives of local people and to get closer to the participants. We explore these issues using examples from our own research with Thai people in southern Thailand and in Melbourne, Australia. We suggest that insider status has an impact on whether the researchers can conduct successful fieldwork and obtain in-depth understanding of the phenomenon being investigated. Being an insider enables a researcher to conduct research more sensitively. It helps in gaining a deeper understanding of the sociocultural contexts of the research setting. However, there are also challenges associated with insider status. These include the need to reestablish our position in a community, our assumptions about what the participants tell us, and participants’ expectations about us. This article provides case examples for researchers who are interested in conducting research, particularly within the Thai context. It should contribute to a conceptual understanding of real life experiences in a cross-cultural context in general.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1609406915621404

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Adler S. M., 2004, Decolonizing research in cross-cultural contexts: Critical personal narratives, 107
  2. 10.1177/1473325007086413 · DOI
  3. 10.3102/0013189X027007004 · DOI
  4. 10.4135/9781412986168.n9 · DOI
  5. Bishop R., 2008, The landscape of qualitative research, 145
  6. 10.1177/1094428106289253 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/1364557032000094560 · DOI
  8. Chawla D., 2007, International Journal of Qualitative Methodology, 5, 1
  9. 10.1080/13613320701845749 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/1077800404265723 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/1473325011401467 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/1525822X09349919 · DOI
  13. Falzon M. A., 2009, Multi-sited ethnography: Theory, praxis and locality in contemporary research, 1
  14. 10.1080/13645570500436163 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/13645570210149796 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/978-1-4020-8567-3_2 · DOI
  17. 10.1525/si.2003.26.4.591 · DOI
  18. 10.4135/9781849209861 · DOI
  19. 10.1017/CBO9780511812705 · DOI
  20. 10.1177/1049732311421680 · DOI
  21. Madden R., 2010, Being ethnographic: A guide to the theory and practice of ethnography
  22. 10.1177/160940690600500209 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/02601370120490 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Morris T., 2008, What do Buddhists believe?: Meaning and mindfulness in Buddhist philosophy
  25. Narayan K., 2008, Representing ethnography, 3, 269
  26. 10.4135/9781446268308 · DOI
  27. Phillips D. A., 2007, Thailand: Modern world nations
  28. 10.1177/1440783305053238 · DOI
  29. Rakhit A., 1998, Researching racism in education: Politics, theory and practice, 55
  30. 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2007.00184.x · DOI
  31. 10.1177/1525822X13516838 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/107780040100700403 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/0038038595029002004 · DOI
  34. Spradley J. P., 1979, The ethnographic interview
  35. 10.1080/09518390600924352 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s10900-011-9360-z · DOI
  37. 10.4135/9781483385686.n2 · DOI
  38. 10.3102/0013189X031009003 · DOI
  39. Van Maanen J., 1988, Tales of the field: On writing ethnography
  40. Walsh-Tapiata W., 2003, Making a difference in families: Research that creates change, 55

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Suwankhong, D., & Liamputtong, P.
Affiliations
  • Thaksin University (TH)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
Corresponding author
Suwankhong, Dusanee
Venue
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Published
2015-12-09
Volume
14
Issue
5
ISSN
1609-4069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2285209268
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5
FWCI
8.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Qualitative Methods (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
Keywords
insider status, insider-outsider distinction, cross-cultural research, fieldwork, researcher positionality, Thai people, southern Thailand, Melbourne, participant expectations, researcher sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review