Cited by 32Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Clinician-trialist rounds: 5. Cointervention bias – how to diagnose it in their trial and prevent it in yours

Sackett, David L·2011·Clinical Trials

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1740774511410995

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sackett, D. L.
Affiliations
Trout Research & Education Centre at Irish Lake, RR 1, Markdale, Ontario, Canada, N0C 1H0
Corresponding author
Sackett, David L
Venue
Clinical Trials
Published
2011-08
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
440-442
ISSN
  • 1740-7745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-7753
OpenAlex
W2051682833
Cited by
32
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Trials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
trial design, bias detection, bias prevention, confounding
MeSH terms
Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Risk, Bias, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review