Cited by 26Ethics in Clinical ResearchEthics and bioethics in healthcareBiomedical Ethics and Regulation

The ethics of uninsured participants accessing healthcare in biomedical research: A literature review

Open access
Cho, Hae Lin, Danis, Marion, Grady, Christine·2018·Clinical Trials

Abstract

Background/aims: Sparse literature exists on the challenges and ethical considerations of including people with limited access to healthcare, such as the uninsured and low-income, in clinical research in high-income countries. However, many ethical issues should be considered with respect to working with uninsured and low-income participants in clinical research, including enrollment and retention, ancillary care, and post-trial responsibilities. Attention to the uninsured and low-income is particularly salient in the United States due to the high rates of uninsurance and underinsurance. Thus, we conducted a scoping review on the ethical considerations of biomedical clinical research with uninsured and low-income participants in high-income countries in order to describe what is known and to pinpoint areas of needed research on this issue. Methods: MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched using terms that described main concepts of interest (e.g., uninsured, underinsured, access to healthcare, poverty, ethics, compensation, clinical research). Articles were included if they met four inclusion criteria: (1) English, (2) high-income countries context, (3) about research participants who are uninsured or low-income, which limits their access to healthcare, and in biomedical clinical research that either had a prospect of direct medical benefit or was offered to them on the basis of their ill health, and (4) recognizes and/or addresses challenges or ethical considerations of uninsured or low-income participants in biomedical clinical research. Results: The searches generated a total of 974 results. Ultimately, 23 papers were included in the scoping review. Of 23 articles, the majority (n = 19) discussed enrollment and retention of uninsured or low-income participants. Several barriers to enrolling uninsured and low-income groups were identified, including limited access to primary or preventive care; lack of access to institutions conducting trials or physicians with enough time or knowledge about trials; overall lack of trust in the government, research, or medical system; and logistical issues. Considerably fewer articles discussed treatment of these participants during the course of research (n = 5) or post-trial responsibilities owed to them (n = 4). Thus, we propose a research agenda that builds upon the existing literature by addressing three broad questions: (1) What is the current status of uninsured research participants in biomedical clinical research in high-income countries? (2) How should uninsured research participants be treated during and after clinical research? (3) How, if at all, should additional protections for uninsured research participants affect their enrollment? Conclusions: This review reveals significant gaps in both data and thoughtful analysis on how to ethically involve uninsured research participants. To address these gaps, we propose a research agenda to gather needed data and theoretical analysis that addresses three broad research questions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1740774518792277

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is generally agreed that trial sponsors and investigators have an ethical obligation to plan to provide care for participants' healthcare needs that arise as a direct consequence of participation in a trial.

    “It is generally agreed that trial sponsors and investigators have an ethical obligation to plan to provide care for participants’ healthcare needs that arise as a direct consequence of participation in a trial.2 501 502”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [13]Bessman SC, Pham JC, Ding R, Factors influencing completion of a follow-up telephone interview of emergency department patients one week after ED visit. Academic Emergency Medicine; 19: S198, https://insights.ovid.com/academic-emergency-medicine/acemd/2012/04/001/factors-influencing-completion-follow-telephone/371/00043480 (2012, accessed 12 May 2018).
  2. [16]The Commonwealth Fund. Underinsured rate increased sharply in 2016; more than two of five marketplace enrollees and a quarter of people with employer health insurance plans are now underinsured. The Commonwealth Fund, http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/press-releases/2017/oct/underinsured-press-release (2017, accessed 2 April 2018).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cho, H. L., Danis, M., & Grady, C.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Cho, Hae Lin
Venue
Clinical Trials
Published
2018-08-02
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
509-521
ISSN
  • 1740-7745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-7753
OpenAlex
W2886337392
Cited by
26
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Trials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH Clinical Center (Intramural Research Program)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Keywords
research ethics, health care access, ancillary care, research compensation, trust in healthcare
MeSH terms
Economic Status, Humans, Poverty, Medically Uninsured, Patient Selection, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review