Cited by 55Educational Leadership and PracticesSchool Leadership and Teacher PerformanceTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Distinctive features of schools in multiple deprived communities in South Africa: Implications for policy and leadership

Maringe, Felix, Masinire, Alfred, Nkambule, Thabisile·2015·Educational Management Administration & Leadership

Abstract

Multiple deprivation affects a large proportion of schools in South Africa. The past 20 years of democracy have tended to focus on reforming education through curricula revision and a raft of redress-directed interventions, through the application of what we call a broad-brush policy approach. The paper argues that a broad-brush policy application fails to recognise the contextualised challenges faced in specific schools. The central purpose of the research was to discover the specific challenges and leadership issues that schools in multiple deprived communities face, and to identify ways in which such schools dealt with these challenges. The research was conducted through a case study approach of three schools in one of the most impoverished provinces of the country. In total 3 principals, 3 parents and 26 teachers were interviewed. The study found that while the three schools shared many similar conditions of poverty that drove the poor to marginal performance, stories of success tended to be strongly related to four key factors: (1) leadership that went beyond an ordinary focus on instruction; (2) staff stability; (3) flexible scheduling that allowed parental involvement; and (4) a focus on a school-wide project that acted as a rallying point and a source of pride for the entire school. The paper identifies asset-based leadership and servant leadership approaches as generative in schools facing multiple deprivation. The paper concludes with a call for more school-based improvement initiatives that seek to interrogate the impact of factors of multiple deprivation, and a broad policy redirection towards school improvement rather than educational reform, which has been the focus in the past 20 years.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1741143215570303

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.1177/105678790201100202 · DOI
  2. Adair J, 1989, Great Leaders
  3. Adamson P, 2012, Measuring Child Poverty: New League Tables of Child Poverty in the World’s Rich Countries
  4. Ainscow M, 1994, School Improvement in an Era of Change
  5. Balfour RJ, 2008, Journal of Rural and Community Development, 3, 95
  6. Barnes H, 2008, Working Paper: Links Between Matriculation, Poverty and Child Support Grants: Review of the Evidence
  7. 10.1177/0013161X99353003 · DOI
  8. Bush T, 2006, Theories of Educational Leadership and Management
  9. 10.1080/13632434.2011.642354 · DOI
  10. 10.1080/0022027042000236163 · DOI
  11. Christie P, 1999, Creating people centred schools: school organisation and change in South Africa
  12. 10.4324/9780203029053 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/10824669.2000.9671381 · DOI
  14. Creswell JW, 2012, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
  15. 10.1108/09578230510625674 · DOI
  16. Donald D, 1997, Educational Psychology in Social Context
  17. Elmore RF, 2007, Harvard Education Letter, 23, 1
  18. Eloff I, 2001, Perspectives in Education, 19, 148
  19. ELRC, 2003, Policy Handbook for Educators
  20. Fleisch B, 2008, Primary Education in Crisis: Why South African Schoolchildren Underachieve in Reading and Mathematics
  21. Forde RD, 2010, Minds and Hearts: exploring the teachers role as a leader of pupils in class
  22. Glaser BG, 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
  23. Gray J, 1995, Good School, Bad School: Evaluating Performance and Encouraging Improvement
  24. 10.34051/p/2020.41 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/08920206020160010301 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/1467-9604.00254 · DOI
  27. HSRC, 2005, Emerging Voices: A Report on Education in South African Rural Communities
  28. Jansen JD, 2004, Educational Policy Borrowing: Historical Perspectives
  29. Kamper G, 2008, South African Journal of Education, 28, 1
  30. Kretzmann JP, 1993, Building Communities from Inside Out: A Path towards Finding and Mobilising Communities’ Assets
  31. 10.4135/9781446219508 · DOI
  32. Mandela N, 2005, Nelson Mandela Foundation Annual Report
  33. Masinire A, 2014, Perspectives in Education, 32, 146
  34. Mbeki T, 1998, Thabo Mbeki: Speech at the Opening of Parliament
  35. Mbokazi Z, 2013, Successful School Leadership in Challenging Circumstances: Case Studies of Three Secondary Schools in Soweto
  36. Moletsane R, 2011, Back to the Future: Productive Remembering in Changing Times
  37. Morrow W, 2007, Learning to Teach in South Africa
  38. Msila V, 2012, Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2, 303
  39. Nemutandani N, 2003, The Management of Educator Redeployment in the Limpopo Province
  40. 10.1007/s11205-012-0047-3 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s11205-009-9460-7 · DOI
  42. Odora-Hoppers CA, 2004, Quarterly Review of Education and Training in South Africa, 11, 17
  43. Odora-Hoppers CA, 2010, Values, Religions in Changing Societies
  44. Ofsted, 2009, The Importance of ICT: Information and Communication Technology in Primary and Secondary Schools 2005/2008
  45. 10.1080/1363243022000020381 · DOI
  46. Prew M, 2014, Twenty Year of education in Gauteng 1994–2014: An Independent Review
  47. Republic of South Africa, 1996, South African Schools Act, Act 84 of 1996
  48. Rizvi F, 2010, Globalizing Education Policy
  49. 10.3102/0002831212463813 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Senge P, 1990, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation
  51. Sobel D, 2004, Place Based Education: Connecting Classrooms and Communities
  52. 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Stegner W, 1992, The Sense of Place
  54. 10.1177/003172170508700414 · DOI
  55. Teddlie C, 2000, The International Handbook of School Effectiveness Research
  56. Valencia RR, 1997, The Evolution of Deficit Thinking: Educational Thought and Practice
  57. 10.1177/0895904896010002008 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Maringe, F., Masinire, A., & Nkambule, T.
Corresponding author
Maringe, Felix
Venue
Educational Management Administration & Leadership
Published
2015-04-08
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
363-385
ISSN
  • 1741-1432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-1440
OpenAlex
W2120437367
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
23.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Management Administration & Leadership (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Leadership and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
multiple deprivation, school leadership, servant leadership, school improvement, educational reform, workforce stability, parental involvement, flexible scheduling, South African schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review