Cited by 19Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Research

Experiences of barriers to self-monitoring and medication-management among Indian patients with type 2 diabetes, their primary family-members and physicians

Chittem, Mahati, Sridharan, Subha Gomathy, Pongener, Matsungshila, Maya, Sravannthi, Epton, Tracy·2022·Chronic Illness

Abstract

Objectives: This study explored the subjective accounts of the main barriers to self-monitoring of blood-glucose (SMBG) and medication-management among Indian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), their primary family-members (PFMs) and physicians. Methods: Using convenience sampling, patients with T2DM, their PFMs, and physicians, residing in a South Indian capital city, were recruited for semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Fifty patients (female = 14; mean age = 42.5 years) and their PFMs (female = 38; mean age = 39 years), and 25 physicians (female = 4; mean age = 49.8 years) were recruited. Three superordinate themes were identified: (i) complex medication-regimen: confusion, forgetting and reduced motivation, (ii) family recommendations of alternative therapies due to the social pressures of avoiding stigma, intrusiveness and being misrepresented for injecting insulin, and (iii) an expensive illness: choosing to spend money on only medication. Discussion: Implications of the findings highlight the need to (i) train physicians in communication and empathy skills, (ii) empower patients to communicate their barriers to physicians through triadic communication models and question-prompt lists, (iii) educate communities on the benefits of insulin for managing T2DM to reduce stigma, and (iv) equip communities with information about health insurance to address the financial toll of T2DM management.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/17423953211032251

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chittem, M., Sridharan, S. G., Pongener, M., Maya, S., & Epton, T.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (IN)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Chittem, Mahati
Venue
Chronic Illness
Published
2021-07-14
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
677-690
ISSN
  • 1742-3953 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-9206
OpenAlex
W3181666454
Cited by
19
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chronic Illness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Archive of Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Human Resource Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, self-monitoring of blood glucose, medication adherence, family caregivers, physician-patient communication, complementary and alternative medicine, financial burden of illness, complex medication regimens, patient empowerment, health insurance, South India
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Physicians, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Social Stigma, Insulins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review