The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leadership as Practice: Challenging the Competency Paradigm
Abstract
Competency frameworks, models, instruments and thinking have long been ingrained and utilized in management and organizational life. Not surprisingly they have been transplanted both swiftly and seemingly easily into the leadership domain. While there certainly have been discomfort and critique from academic and practitioner sources, nothing has emerged strongly enough to date that would provide an alternative mode of framing and translating both leadership and leadership development in the different contexts that seek to make it visible. In this article, consequently, we submit leadership and its development to the `practice turn' to enable a radically different perspective from a competency orientated one. The ontology, epistemology and methodologies of practice are examined and translated to the leadership field. We argue that a focus on praxis, practitioner and practice offers both challenge and transformation to the ways that leadership is bounded and constrained by current organizational and managerial conventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M., Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,454
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Outline of a Theory of Practice
Bourdieu, P. (1977) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812507 · Cited by 27,606
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Outline of a Theory of Practice.
Frank, A. W., & Bourdieu, P. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2066038 · Cited by 14,545
Hepburn, R. W., Heidegger, M., Macquarrie, J., & Robinson, E. (1927) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 12,201
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113 · cited 1×
“In this, the leadership development programmes relied strongly on concepts of ‘reflection-in-action’ (Schon, 1983), wisdom (Grint, 2007), ‘observable practice’ (Kelly et al., 2006), deep learning (Agyris & Schon, 1978) and situated learning (Lave and Wenger, 1991).”
Background5. The Practice of Everyday Life
(2000) · In One's Own Shadow · doi:10.1525/9780520923478-008 · Cited by 10,734
Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing
Reckwitz, A. (2002) · European Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1177/13684310222225432 · Cited by 5,544
Outline of a Theory of Practice
BOURDIEU, P. (2007) · On Violence · doi:10.2307/j.ctv120qr2d.16 · Cited by 5,527
Cited by
Cunliffe, A. L., & Eriksen, M. (2011) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726711418388 · Cited by 594
The Routledge Companion to Leadership
(2016) · doi:10.4324/9781315739854 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Carroll, B., Levy, L., & Richmond, D.
- Venue
- Leadership
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 363-379
- ISSN
- 1742-7150 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-7169
- OpenAlex
- W2111994712
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 33.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leadership as Practice: Challenging the Competency Paradigm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1742715008095186
- The paper
- Carroll, B., Levy, L., & Richmond, D. (2008). Leadership as Practice: Challenging the Competency Paradigm. Leadership. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008095186
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.