The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causal Inference and Observational Research: The Utility of Twins
Open accessAbstract
Valid causal inference is central to progress in theoretical and applied psychology. Although the randomized experiment is widely considered the gold standard for determining whether a given exposure increases the likelihood of some specified outcome, experiments are not always feasible and in some cases can result in biased estimates of causal effects. Alternatively, standard observational approaches are limited by the possibility of confounding, reverse causation, and the nonrandom distribution of exposure (i.e., selection). We describe the counterfactual model of causation and apply it to the challenges of causal inference in observational research, with a particular focus on aging. We argue that the study of twin pairs discordant on exposure, and in particular discordant monozygotic twins, provides a useful analog to the idealized counterfactual design. A review of discordant-twin studies in aging reveals that they are consistent with, but do not unambiguously establish, a causal effect of lifestyle factors on important late-life outcomes. Nonetheless, the existing studies are few in number and have clear limitations that have not always been considered in interpreting their results. It is concluded that twin researchers could make greater use of the discordant-twin design as one approach to strengthen causal inferences in observational research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Monozygotic twins share both a common genotype and a similar rearing environment.”
From Life Events and Personality Trait Change. (2018) · cites this paper as McGue, Osler, & Christensen, 2010
In the citing paper
“This approach adjusted for confounding from all factors shared across individuals initiating analgesic treatment with opioids and with NSAIDs (eg, indications for pain treatment)”
From Association of opioid prescription initiation during adolescence and young adulthood with subsequent substance-related morbidity (2020) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Hirono, N., Mori, E., Ikejiri, Y., Imamura, T., Shimomura, T., Hashimoto, M., Yamashita, H., & Ikeda, M. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 21,012
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
Peek, S. T. M., Luijkx, K. G., Rijnaard, M. D., Nieboer, M. E., van der Voort, C. S., Aarts, S., van Hoof, J., Vrijhoef, H. J., & Wouters, E. (2015) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000430949 · Cited by 19,852
Sensitivity and False Alarm Rate of a Fall Sensor in Long-Term Fall Detection in the Elderly
Kangas, M., Korpelainen, R., Vikman, I., Nyberg, L., & Jämsä, T. J. (2014) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000362720 · Cited by 19,007
(2002) · Cited by 13,211
Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
Pearl, J. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803161 · Cited by 11,653
Littell, R. C. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10,345
CAUSALITY: MODELS, REASONING AND INFERENCE
Hitchcock, C., & Pearl, J. (2001) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/3182612 · Cited by 4,827
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Ashenfelter O., 1994, American Economic Review, 84, 1157
- Bentler P.M., 1985, Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program
- Bouchard T.J., 1993, Twins as a tool of behavioral genetics
- Kaprio J., 1993, Twins as a tool of behavioral genetics, 287
- Rehm J., 2007, Addiction Research & Theory, 15, 20
- Rehm J., 2003, Alcohol Research & Health, 27, 39
- Scarr S., 1983, Child Development, 54, 424
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Life Events and Personality Trait Change.
Bleidorn, W., Hopwood, C. J., & Lucas, R. E. (2018) · Journal of personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12286 · Cited by 588
Sibling Comparison Designs: Bias From Non-Shared Confounders and Measurement Error
Frisell, T., Öberg, S., Kuja-Halkola, R., & Sjölander, A. (2012) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/ede.0b013e31825fa230 · Cited by 551
Using genetic data to strengthen causal inference in observational research
Pingault, J.-B., O’Reilly, P. F., Schoeler, T., Ploubidis, G. B., Rijsdijk, F., & Dudbridge, F. (2018) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0020-3 · Cited by 444
D’Onofrio, B. M., Lahey, B. B., Turkheimer, E., & Lichtenstein, P. (2013) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301252 · Cited by 343
Bullying victimisation and risk of self harm in early adolescence: longitudinal cohort study
Fisher, H. L., Moffitt, T. E., Houts, R., Belsky, D. W., Arseneault, L., & Caspi, A. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e2683 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- McGue, M., Osler, M., & Christensen, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Corresponding author
- McGue, Matt
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 546-556
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- PMC
- PMC3094752
- OpenAlex
- W2024702358
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA009367, R37AA009367)
- National Institute on Aging (P01AG008761)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- causal inference, observational studies, discordant twins, monozygotic twins, aging, confounding, reverse causality, selection bias, lifestyle factors, causal effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review