Cited by 444Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Using genetic data to strengthen causal inference in observational research

Open access
Pingault, Jean-Baptiste, O’Reilly, Paul F., Schoeler, Tabea, Ploubidis, George B., Rijsdijk, Frühling, Dudbridge, Frank·2018·Nature Reviews Genetics

Abstract

Causal inference is essential across the biomedical, behavioural and social sciences.By progressing from confounded statistical associations to evidence of causal relationships, causal inference can reveal complex pathways underlying traits and diseases and help to prioritize targets for intervention. Recent progress in genetic epidemiology - including statistical innovation, massive genotyped data sets and novel computational tools for deep data mining - has fostered the intense development of methods exploiting genetic data and relatedness to strengthen causal inference in observational research. In this Review, we describe how such genetically informed methods differ in their rationale, applicability and inherent limitations and outline how they should be integrated in the future to offer a rich causal inference toolbox.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41576-018-0020-3

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The family fixed-effects model can approximate the counterfactual situation because a non-exposed sibling or twin represents a natural match to their exposed co-sibling or twin.

    “Pingault et al. (2018, p. 569) recently noted that the family fixed‐effects model can “approximate the counterfactual situation because a non‐exposed sibling or twin represents a natural match to their exposed co‐sibling or twin.””
  • Genetically informative samples can strengthen causal inference in observational research.

    “Genetically informative samples can strengthen causal inference in observational research (Pingault et al., 2018).”
  • Within-family genetic association estimates, such as those obtained from samples of siblings, can provide less biased estimates of direct genetic effects because they are unlikely to be affected by demographic and indirect genetic effects of parents.

    “Within-family genetic association estimates, such as those obtained from samples of siblings, can provide less biased estimates of direct genetic effects because they are unlikely to be affected by demographic and indirect genetic effects of parents7,17,30–34.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pingault, J.-B., O’Reilly, P. F., Schoeler, T., Ploubidis, G. B., Rijsdijk, F., & Dudbridge, F.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Pingault, Jean-Baptiste
Venue
Nature Reviews Genetics
Published
2018-06-05
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
566-580
ISSN
  • 1471-0056 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0064
OpenAlex
W2806899908
Cited by
444
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 11
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • MQ: Transforming Mental Health (MQ16IP16)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/N015746/1)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M001660/1, ES/M008584/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
causal inference, genetic epidemiology, observational studies, confounding, Mendelian randomization, causal mechanisms, environmental exposure, risk factors, intervention targets
MeSH terms
Genotype, Humans, Databases, Genetic, Data Mining, Genotyping Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review