CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 166LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyGender and Feminist Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sexual Orientation Differences as Deficits: Science and Stigma in the History of American Psychology

Herek, Gregory M.·2010·Perspectives on Psychological Science
DOI 10.1177/1745691610388770
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article briefly describes how psychology, psychiatry, and the mental health professions (here collectively referred to as Psychology) treated sexual orientation differences as deficits for much of the 20th century, as well as some of the negative consequences that practice had for sexual minorities. The 1970s witnessed a remarkable turnaround when the American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and the American Psychological Association called for psychologists to work to remove the stigma historically associated with homosexuality. This history illustrates not only how cultural institutions play a central role in legitimating stigma, but also how they can recognize their own complicity in this process and work effectively to undo its harmful effects. It is argued that Psychology still has an important role to play in challenging the differences-as-deficits model in contemporary policy debates.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691610388770

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bérubé A, 1990, Coming out under fire: The history of gay men and women in World War II
  2. Chauncey G., 1982, Salmagundi, 58, 114
  3. Harrison J., 1991, Changing our minds: The story of Dr. Evelyn Hooker
  4. Katz J.N., 1976, Gay American history: Lesbians and gay men in the U.S.A
  5. Rekers G.A., 2005, St. Thomas Law Review, 18, 325
  6. Toalston A. (2004). Psychologists' OK of same-sex unions called “gay agenda.” Nashville, TN: Baptist Press. Retrieved July 7, 2010, from http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?ID=18784

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 166

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Herek, G. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Herek, Gregory M.
Venue
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2010-11
Volume
5
Issue
6
Pages
693-699
ISSN
  • 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-6924
DOI
10.1177/1745691610388770
OpenAlex
W2321722844
Cited by
166
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
sexual orientation, homosexuality, stigma, deficit model, history of psychology, mental health professions, American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, DSM, gay rights, sexual minorities, institutional complicity, 20th century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review