The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-Talk and Sports Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Based on the premise that what people think influences their actions, self-talk strategies have been developed to direct and facilitate human performance. In this article, we present a meta-analytic review of the effects of self-talk interventions on task performance in sport and possible factors that may moderate the effectiveness of self-talk. A total of 32 studies yielding 62 effect sizes were included in the final meta-analytic pool. The analysis revealed a positive moderate effect size (ES = .48). The moderator analyses showed that self-talk interventions were more effective for tasks involving relatively fine, compared with relatively gross, motor demands, and for novel, compared with well-learned, tasks. Instructional self-talk was more effective for fine tasks than was motivational self-talk; moreover, instructional self-talk was more effective for fine tasks rather than gross tasks. Finally, interventions including self-talk training were more effective than those not including self-talk training. The results of this study establish the effectiveness of self-talk in sport, encourage the use of self-talk as a strategy to facilitate learning and enhance performance, and provide new research directions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Teaching concentration can increase youth athletes’ abilities to focus, as can self-talk, and linking the association between positive self-talk and performance in youth athletes is paramount (Hatzigeorgiadis et al., 2011).”
From Integrating Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) with Psychological Skills Training (PST): a case study (2025) · cites this paper as Hatzigeorgiadis et al., 2011
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Cognitive-Behavior Modification
Meichenbaum, D. H. (1977) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-9739-8 · Cited by 4,029
International Journal of Special Education
(2022) · doi:10.52783/ijse · Cited by 2,527
Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.105 · Cited by 2,502
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.
Raudenbush, S. W., Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289738 · Cited by 2,368
Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis
Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0019486 · Cited by 2,265
Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs
Morris, S. B. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106291059 · Cited by 2,133
Cognitive-Behavior Modification: An Integrative Approach
Meichenbaum, D. H. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,619
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- *Cornspan A. S., 2004, Journal of Mental Imagery, 28, 59
- *Goudas M., 2006, Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 3, 105
- Hardy J., 2009, Advances in applied sport psychology: A review, 37
- *Harvey D. T., 2002, International Sports Journal, 6, 84
- Hatzigeorgiadis A., 2006, Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 3, 164
- *Hatzigeorgiadis A., 2009, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 185
- *Malouff J. M., 2008, Journal of Sport Behavior, 31, 264
- *Malouff J. M., 2006, Journal of Sport Behavior, 29, 159
- *Masciana R. C., 2001, International Sports Journal, 5, 31
- *Peluso E. A., 2005, Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine, 4, 543
- *Tod D. A., 2008, National Strength and Conditioning Association, 23, 196
- *Van Raalte J. L., 1995, Journal of Sport Behavior, 18, 50
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Psychological Determinants of Whole-Body Endurance Performance
McCormick, A., Meijen, C., & Marcora, S. M. (2015) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-015-0319-6 · Cited by 276
Mindfulness and acceptance approaches to sporting performance enhancement: a systematic review.
Noetel, M., Ciarrochi, J., Van Zanden, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2019) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2017.1387803 · Cited by 282
“The review team formulated search terms using the titles, abstracts, and keywords of existing meta-analyses (Hatzigeorgiadis et al., 2011; Kyllo & Landers, 1995; Levin et al., 2012),”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEffects of Psychological and Psychosocial Interventions on Sport Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Brown, D. J. W., & Fletcher, D. (2016) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0552-7 · Cited by 247
The effects of imagery interventions in sports: a meta-analysis
Simonsmeier, B. A., Andronie, M., Buecker, S., & Frank, C. (2020) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2020.1780627 · Cited by 233
“It is also comparable to the effects from other meta-analyses investigating effects of psychological interventions on sports performance, such as goal setting (Kyllo & Landers, 1995) or self-talk interventions (Hatzigeorgiadis et al., 2011).”
ResultSelf-talk: Review and sport-specific model.
Van Raalte, J. L., Vincent, A., & Brewer, B. W. (2016) · Psychology of Sport and Exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.08.004 · Cited by 179
“A metaanalysis of the instructional and motivational self-ta k and performance in sport literature provided support for the framework, demonstrating the effects of self-talk on performance and highlighting the importance of situational factors (Hatzigeorgiadis et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Zourbanos, N., Galanis, E., & Theodorakis, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Thessaly (GR)
- Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Thessaly, Trikala, Greece
- Corresponding author
- Hatzigeorgiadis, Antonis
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 348-356
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W2057172229
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Thessaly Institutional Repository (University of Thessaly) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Keywords
- self-talk, athletic performance, instructional self-talk, motivational self-talk, motor skill learning, task novelty, moderators of intervention effectiveness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
