Vocational Interests and Performance: A Quantitative Summary of Over 60 Years of Research
Abstract
Despite early claims that vocational interests could be used to distinguish successful workers and superior students from their peers, interest measures are generally ignored in the employee selection literature. Nevertheless, theoretical descriptions of vocational interests from vocational and educational psychology have proposed that interest constructs should be related to performance and persistence in work and academic settings. Moreover, on the basis of Holland's (1959, 1997) theoretical predictions, congruence indices, which quantify the degree of similarity or person-environment fit between individuals and their occupations, should be more strongly related to performance than interest scores alone. Using a comprehensive review of the interest literature that spans more than 60 years of research, a meta-analysis was conducted to examine the veracity of these claims. A literature search identified 60 studies and approximately 568 correlations that addressed the relationship between interests and performance. Results showed that interests are indeed related to performance and persistence in work and academic contexts. In addition, the correlations between congruence indices and performance were stronger than for interest scores alone. Thus, consistent with interest theory, the fit between individuals and their environment was more predictive of performance than interest alone.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Vocational interests can direct, energize, and sustain behavior, making them a relevant predictor for outcomes like job or study choice, engagement, and performance.
“Vocational interests can direct, energize, and sustain behavior which makes them a relevant predictor for outcomes like job or study choice, engagement, and performance (e.g., Nye et al., 2012).”
From The German O*NET Interest Profiler Short Form (2023) · cites this paper as Nye et al., 2012
Employees who show better interest fit have higher job performance.
“employees who show better interest fit have higher job performance (Nye et al., 2012(Nye et al., , 2017;;Van Iddekinge et al., 2011b)”
From Interest Fit Beyond the RIASEC: The Comprehensive Assessment of Basic Interests—O*NET (CABIN-NET) (2026) · cites this paper as Nye et al., 2012
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 146 · Cited by 359
- Authors
- Nye, C. D., Su, R., Rounds, J., & Drasgow, F.
- Affiliations
- Bowling Green State University (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Venue
- Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-06-29
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 384-403
- ISSN
- 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-6924
- OpenAlex
- W1983952641
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 146
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 47.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- career interest, employee performance, person-environment fit, Holland's theory of vocational choice, interest measures, academic persistence, personnel selection, interest theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review