Cited by 274Psychology Research and BibliometricsAcademic Publishing and Open AccessMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science

Giner-Sorolla, Roger·2012·Perspectives on Psychological Science

DOI 10.1177/1745691612457576

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The current crisis in psychological research involves issues of fraud, replication, publication bias, and false positive results. I argue that this crisis follows the failure of widely adopted solutions to psychology’s similar crisis of the 1970s. The untouched root cause is an information-economic one: Too many studies divided by too few publication outlets equals a bottleneck. Articles cannot pass through just by showing theoretical meaning and methodological rigor; their results must appear to support the hypothesis perfectly. Consequently, psychologists must master the art of presenting perfect-looking results just to survive in the profession. This favors aesthetic criteria of presentation in a way that harms science’s search for truth. Shallow standards of statistical perfection distort analyses and undermine the accuracy of cumulative data; narrative expectations encourage dishonesty about the relationship between results and hypotheses; criteria of novelty suppress replication attempts. Concerns about truth in research are emerging in other sciences and may eventually descend on our heads in the form of difficult and insensitive regulations. I suggest a more palatable solution: to open the bottleneck, putting structures in place to reward broader forms of information sharing beyond the exquisite art of present-day journal publication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1745691612457576

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567
Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.
Chaiken, S. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.39.5.752 · Cited by 5,516
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702 · cited 3×
“It was in that field that Ioannidis (2005) declared that “most published research findings are false” because of incentives to publish only positive results.”
Background
The earth is round (p < .05).
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Howel, D., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1995) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533295 · Cited by 3,657
Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience?
Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3 · Cited by 3,149
Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
Begley, C. G., & Ellis, L. M. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/483531a · Cited by 2,979 · cited 1×
“Confidence in the applied usefulness of the publication process has taken a hit, as clinical trials have demonstrated unusually low success rates when trying to reproduce academic results (Begley & Ellis, 2012; Prinz, Schlange, & Asadullah, 2011; Turner, Matthews, et al., 2008).”
Result
Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.8.594 · Cited by 2,791

Show all 70 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

Carpenter D., 2007, Northwestern University Law Review, 101, 687
10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752 · DOI · Paper page
Chamberlin J., 2000, APA Monitor, 31, 36
Eco U., 1985, Daedalus, 114, 161
Gillie O., 1977, The Phi Delta Kappan, 58, 469
ISI Web of Knowledge. (2012). Journal citation reports. Retrieved from http://admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/JCR?PointOfEntry=Home&SID=R2H17OMe9G5oN@26iil
Kaiser C. R., 2012, Dialogue, 26, 8
Pennington N., 1991, Cardozo Law Review, 13, 519
Ritchie S. J., 2012, The Psychologist, 25, 346
Voss J. F., 1999, Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso, 235

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 273

When does priming justice promote forgiveness? On the importance of distributive and procedural justice for self and others
Lucas, T., Strelan, P., Karremans, J. C., Sutton, R. M., Najmi, E., & Malik, Z. (2017) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2017.1303533 · Cited by 24
Open Science is for Aging Research, Too
Isaacowitz, D. M., & Lind, M. (2019) · Innovation in Aging · doi:10.1093/geroni/igz028 · Cited by 25
In Search Of True Things Worth Knowing: Considerations For A New Article Prototype
Tullett, A. M. (2015) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12166 · Cited by 24
Why Psychology Needs to Stop Striving for Novelty and How to Move Towards Theory-Driven Research
Burghardt, J., & Bodansky, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.609802 · Cited by 28
Reading Minds and Being Invisible
Howland, M. (2015) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550615606195 · Cited by 23
Open Science and Single-Case Design Research
Cook, B. G., Johnson, A. H., Maggin, D. M., Therrien, W. J., Barton, E. E., Lloyd, J. W., Reichow, B., Talbott, E., & Travers, J. C. (2021) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932521996452 · Cited by 23
Replicability in Brain Imaging
Kelly, R. E., & Hoptman, M. J. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12030397 · Cited by 24
Unpredictability increases the error-related negativity in children and adolescents
Speed, B. C., Jackson, F. L., Nelson, B. D., Infantolino, Z. P., & Hajcak, G. (2017) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2017.09.006 · Cited by 25
On reproducibility and replicability: Arguing for open science practices and methodological improvements at the South African Journal of Industrial Psychology
Efendić, E., & van Zyl, L. E. (2019) · SA Journal of Industrial Psychology · doi:10.4102/sajip.v45i0.1607 · Cited by 26
It's time! Ten reasons to start replicating simulation studies
Lohmann, A., Astivia, O. L. O., Morris, T. P., & Groenwold, R. H. H. (2022) · Frontiers in Epidemiology · doi:10.3389/fepid.2022.973470 · Cited by 24
Untitled work
(2015) · HAL · Cited by 20
Knowledge about eyewitness testimony: a survey of Indonesian police officers and psychologists
Sumampouw, N. E. J., Bjørndal, L. D., Magnussen, S. J., Otgaar, H., & Brennen, T. (2021) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2021.1962868 · Cited by 18
Communally constrained decisions in workplace contexts
McCarty, M. K., Monteith, M. J., & Kaiser, C. R. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.007 · Cited by 18
Questionable Research Practices
O’Boyle, E. H., & Götz, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190938550.003.0010 · Cited by 21
The volatile nature of positive affect effects: opposite effects of positive affect and time on task on proactive control
Hefer, C., & Dreisbach, G. (2018) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1086-4 · Cited by 19
A Social Psychological Model of Scientific Practices: Explaining Research Practices and Outlining the Potential for Successful Reforms
Jussim, L. J., Krosnick, J. A., Stevens, S. T., & Anglin, S. M. (2019) · Psychologica Belgica · doi:10.5334/pb.496 · Cited by 16
Quantifying evidential value and selective reporting in recent and 10-year past psychophysiological literature: A pre-registered P-curve analysis
Carbine, K. A., Lindsey, H. M., Rodeback, R. E., & Larson, M. J. (2019) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.06.004 · Cited by 16
The Self-Referencing task: Theoretical overview and empirical evidence
Mattavelli, S., Richetin, J., Gallucci, M., & Perugini, M. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.02.006 · Cited by 18
The associations between spindle characteristics and cognitive ability in a large adolescent birth cohort
Pesonen, A., Ujma, P. P., Halonen, R., Räikkönen, K., & Kuula, L. (2018) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2018.11.004 · Cited by 15
How well are open science practices implemented in industrial and organizational psychology and management?
Torka, A., Mazei, J., Bosco, F. A., Cortina, J. M., Götz, M., Kepes, S., O’Boyle, E. H., & Hüffmeier, J. (2023) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2023.2206571 · Cited by 20
Multivariate prediction of cognitive performance from the sleep electroencephalogram
Ujma, P. P., Bódizs, R., Dresler, M., Simor, P., Purcell, S., Stone, K. L., Yaffe, K. S., & Redline, S. S. (2023) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120319 · Cited by 18
Broken windows, mediocre methods, and substandard statistics
Wicherts, J. M., & Bakker, M. (2013) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430213502557 · Cited by 17
Registered Reports in Special Education: Introduction to the Special Series
Cook, B. G., Maggin, D. M., & Robertson, R. E. (2021) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932521996459 · Cited by 14
Open Access, Scholarly Communication, and Open Science in Psychology: An Overview for Researchers
Mullen, L. B. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440231205390 · Cited by 18
Making Research Data Accessible
Kapiszewski, D., & Karcher, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.008 · Cited by 15
Is Open Science Neoliberal?
Tunç, D. U., Tunç, M. N., & Eper, Z. B. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221114835 · Cited by 18
Converging electrophysiological evidence for a processing advantage of social over nonsocial feedback
Pfabigan, D. M., & Han, S. (2019) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-019-00737-9 · Cited by 17
Infants’ ability to extract three-dimensional shape from coherent motion
Hirshkowitz, A., & Wilcox, T. G. (2013) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.09.003 · Cited by 13
Thinking About Data, Research Methods, and Statistical Analyses: Commentary on Sijtsma’s (2014) “Playing with Data”
Waldman, I., & Lilienfeld, S. (2015) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/s11336-015-9447-z
Psychological science’s replicability crisis and what it means for science in the courtroomPreprint
Chin, J. M. (2017) · doi:10.31228/osf.io/afrz4 · Cited by 13
Introduction to the Special Issue on Methodological Rigor and Replicability
Stangor, C., & Lemay, E. P. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.006 · Cited by 17
p-Hacking and Publication Bias Interact to Distort Meta-Analytic Effect Size EstimatesPreprint
Friese, M., & Frankenbach, J. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bvm58 · Cited by 15
Evidence‐based vegetation management: prospects and challenges
Milberg, P. (2014) · Applied Vegetation Science · doi:10.1111/avsc.12114 · Cited by 12
Commentary: A big problem requires a foundational change
Dovidio, J. F. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.01.008 · Cited by 12
Forschungstransparenz als hohes wissenschaftliches Gut stärken
Schönbrodt, F. D., Maier, M., Heene, M., & Bühner, M. (2018) · Psychologische Rundschau · doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000386 · Cited by 12
Preregistration of Randomized Controlled Trials
Cook, B. G., Wong, V. C., Fleming, J. I., & Solari, E. J. (2022) · Research on Social Work Practice · doi:10.1177/10497315221121117 · Cited by 11
Benefit-Finding Improves Well-Being among Women Who Have Experienced Gender Discrimination
Mosley, A. J., & Branscombe, N. R. (2020) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-020-01175-5 · Cited by 11
Perspectives: replication is more than meets the eye
Bergkvist, L., Keyzer, F. D., & Buzeta, C. (2023) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2023.2245278 · Cited by 11
Understanding the data‐sharing debate in the context of Aotearoa/New Zealand: a narrative review on the perspectives of funders, publishers/journals, researchers, participants and Māori collectives
Reeves, J., Treharne, G. J., Theodore, R. F., Iwi, N. W. E. T., Ratima, M. M., & Poulton, R. (2021) · Kōtuitui New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online · doi:10.1080/1177083x.2021.1922465 · Cited by 9
Surveillance Is Not the Answer, and Replication Is Not a Test: Comment on Kepes and McDaniel, “How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in I–O Psychology?”
Derksen, M., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2013) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/iops.12053 · Cited by 10
Open Up – the Mission Statement of the Control of Impulsive Action (Ctrl-ImpAct) Lab on Open Science
Reimer, C. B., Chen, Z., Bundt, C., Eben, C., London, R. E., & Vardanian, S. (2019) · Psychologica Belgica · doi:10.5334/pb.494 · Cited by 11
Investigating the True Effect of Psychological Variables Measured Prior to Arthroplastic Surgery on Postsurgical Outcomes: A P-Curve Analysis
Niederstrasser, N. G., & Cook, S. (2020) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2020.07.005 · Cited by 12
Open Science in Applied Linguistics: An Introduction to MetasciencePreprint
Al‐Hoorie, A. H., & Hiver, P. V. (2023) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/76dak · Cited by 11
Will We March to Utopia, or Be Dragged There? Past Failures and Future Hopes for Publishing Our Science
Giner‐Sorolla, R. (2012) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2012.706506 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Reshaping the publication process: Addiction Research and Theory joins Peer Community In Registered Reports
Pennington, C. R., & Heim, D. (2021) · Addiction Research & Theory · doi:10.1080/16066359.2021.1931142 · Cited by 11
The Importance of Replication
Grahe, J. E., & Cuccolo, K. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009000796.014 · Cited by 9
The Reproducibility Project: A Model of Large-Scale Collaboration for Empirical Research on ReproducibilityPreprint
Open Science Collaboration (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2195999 · Cited by 8
Threats to the scientific status of experimental consumer psychology
McQuarrie, E. F. (2014) · Marketing Theory · doi:10.1177/1470593114540678 · Cited by 8
Cybersecurity Regrets: I’ve had a few.... Je Ne Regrette
Renaud, K., Searle, R., & Dupuis, M. (2022) · New Security Paradigms Workshop · doi:10.1145/3584318.3584319 · Cited by 7
A meta-analytical answer to the crisis of confidence of Psychology
Botella, J., & Durán, J. I. (2019) · Anales de Psicología · doi:10.6018/analesps.35.2.345291 · Cited by 10
Toward Transparent Reporting of Psychological Science
LeBel, E. P., & John, L. K. (2017) · doi:10.1002/9781119095910.ch5 · Cited by 8
Toward Open Science: Contributing to Research Culture Change
Shaw, L. C., Errington, T. M., & Mellor, D. T. (2022) · Science Editor · doi:10.36591/se-d-4501-14 · Cited by 11
International Collaboration in Latin American Psychology Through the Analysis of Co-authorship Networks
López‐López, W., Lucio‐Arias, D., Díaz-Nova, A. M., & Silva, L. M. (2023) · Trends in Psychology · doi:10.1007/s43076-023-00266-y · Cited by 7
VII. REPLICATION, RESEARCH ACCUMULATION, AND META-ANALYSIS IN DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE
Card, N. A. (2017) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.1111/mono.12301 · Cited by 7
Using “Cinéma Vérité” (truthful cinema) to facilitate replication and accountability in psychological research†
Suls, J. M. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00872 · Cited by 8
Commentary: The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
Botella, J., & Suero, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.581910 · Cited by 7
Theorizing Gender in Online Privacy Research
Frener, R., & Trepte, S. (2022) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000327 · Cited by 5
Research-Problem Validity in Primary Research: Precision and Transparency in Characterizing Past Knowledge
Schweinsberg, M., Thau, S., & Pillutla, M. M. (2023) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916221144990 · Cited by 10
Is Science in Crisis?
Fanelli, D. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190938550.003.0004 · Cited by 5
Are replications mainstream now? A comparison of support for replications expressed in the policies of social psychology journals in 2015 and 2022
Torka, A., Mazei, J., & Hüffmeier, J. (2023) · Social Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.32872/spb.9695 · Cited by 8
Confidence? Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science : A Crisis of
Wagenmakers, E., & Pashler, H. (2012) · Cited by 6
Why I declare a conflict of interest and you should not
Acem, E., Aczél, B., Albayrak‐Aydemir, N., Brown, N. J. L., Dudda, L. A., Elsherif, M. M., Gjoneska, B., Kowal, M., Krishna, A., Miłkoś, S., et al. (2025) · Theory and Society · doi:10.1007/s11186-025-09641-3 · Cited by 5
Novelty, Consistency, Transparency: The Trilemma of Psychological Sciences and its Consequences on Open Science Practices
Bertin, P., & Nera, K. (2025) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.979 · Cited by 6
Replicability in psychological research: a reflection
Leyva, S. B. C., & Domínguez-Lara, S. (2020) · Interacciones Revista de Avances en Psicología · doi:10.24016/2020.v6n3.172 · Cited by 10
Cobblers, Let’s Stick to Our Lasts! A Song of Sorrow (and of Hope) About the State of Personnel and Human Resource Management Science
Götz, M., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2023) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s0742-730120230000041004 · Cited by 8
Psychological Distance and the Discrepancy Between Recommendations and Actions
Howell, J. L., Sweeny, K. M., & Shepperd, J. A. (2014) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2014.958229 · Cited by 5
Only Human: Scientists, Systems, and Suspect Statistics
Hardwicke, T. E., Jameel, L., Jones, M., Walczak, E., & Magis‐Weinberg, L. (2014) · Opticon1826 · doi:10.5334/opt.ch · Cited by 5
The impact of goal progress and individual differences on self‐regulation in training
Donovan, J. J., Lorenzet, S. J., Dwight, S. A., & Schneider, D. (2018) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12556 · Cited by 8
Misinformation Effect in Aging: A New Light with Equivalence Testing
Tessoulin, M., Galharret, J., Gilet, A.-L., & Colombel, F. (2019) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbz057 · Cited by 5
Reliability of Inference: Analogs of Replication in Qualitative Research
Fairfield, T., & Charman, A. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.012 · Cited by 6
Introduction
Gerring, J., Mahoney, J., & Elman, C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.001 · Cited by 6
Communicating uncertain experimental evidence.
Davis, A. L., & Fischhoff, B. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0033778 · Cited by 5
Behavior and Development
Ditmar, M. F. (2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-06561-0.00002-1 · Cited by 7
Doctoral thesis: The human fallibility of scientists - dealing with error and bias in academic researchPreprint
Veldkamp, C. L. S. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/g8cjq · Cited by 6
Successes and Failures of Replications: A Meta-Analysis of Independent Replication Studies Based on the OSF RegistriesPreprint
Röseler, L., Gendlina, T., Krapp, J., Labusch, N., & Schütz, A. (2022) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/8psw2 · Cited by 7
Replication for Quantitative Research
Jeremy Freese, A., & Peterson, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.010 · Cited by 4
Transparency and Reproducibility: Conceptualizing the Problem
Christensen, G., & Miguel, E. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.006 · Cited by 4
Measurement Replication in Qualitative and Quantitative Studies
Reiter, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.011 · Cited by 4
The Importance of Rigorous Methods in a Growing Research Field
Hostler, T. (2022) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2020.2626 · Cited by 6
Open Science in the Field of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
Cook, B. G., Lloyd, J. W., & Therrien, W. J. (2019) · Education and Treatment of Children · doi:10.1353/etc.2019.0027 · Cited by 4
Persistence and plasticity in the human memory system: An empirical investigation of the overwriting hypothesisPreprint
Hardwicke, T. E. (2017) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/r4c32 · Cited by 4
Definitely Maybe: Hedges And Boosters in the HCI LiteraturePreprint
Besançon, L., Jansen, Y., Cockburn, A., & Dragicevic, P. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/mjg7h · Cited by 6
Registered Reports: A Method to Increase the Credibility of Published ReportsPreprint
Nosek, B. A., & Lakens, D. (2016) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/mgxyg · Cited by 4
Quality assessment of scientific manuscripts in peer review and educationPreprint
Augusteijn, H. E. M., Wicherts, J. M., Sijtsma, K., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2023) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/7dc6a · Cited by 4
Unsolved Mysteries of the Mind and the Brain: Fractal Brain Hypothesis
Dutta, T., & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2024) · Studies in Rhythm Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-9334-5_1 · Cited by 4
Cities, Poverty and Food: The role of municipalities in enhancing food security
Mazenda, A., Mushayanyama, T., Masiya, T., Simawu, M., Mushayanyama, T., Masiya, T., & Simawu, M. (2021) · Urbana - Urban Affairs & Public Policy · doi:10.47785/urbana.3.2021 · Cited by 3
Accelerating addiction research via Open Science and Team Science
Dora, J., Piccirillo, M. L., Foster, K. T., & King, K. M. (2023) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2023.06.004 · Cited by 3
Les pratiques de recherche ouvertes en psychologie
Lantian, A. (2020) · Psychologie Française · doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2020.09.001 · Cited by 6
Editorial Decisions May Perpetuate Belief in Invalid Research Findings
Eriksson, K., & Simpson, B. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073364 · Cited by 3
The Emergence of Forensic ObjectivityPreprint
Peterson, D. (2016) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/2ft8x · Cited by 3
Contributions towards understanding and building sustainable sciencePreprint
Hartgerink, C. H. J. (2019) · Thesis Commons (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31237/osf.io/4wtpc · Cited by 3
Researcher Degrees of Freedom and a Lack of Transparency Contribute to Unreliable Results of Nonparametric Statistical Analyses Across SPSS, SAS, Stata, and RPreprint
Hodges, C. B., Lindsey, H. M., Stone, B. M., Johnson, P. K., & Carter, J. H. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zem2w · Cited by 4
Examining Erectile Disorder Manifestations and the Impact of Point-Of-View in Virtual Reality Erotica
Lafortune, D., Bonneau, J., Lapointe, V. A., Dubé, S., Calazana, F., Labrie, C., Canivet, C., & Godbout, N. (2025) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2025.2478574 · Cited by 2
Going off script: Exploring the reporting of preregistration deviations in Industrial and Organizational Psychology and their relationship with questionable research practices
Torka, A., & Hüffmeier, J. (2025) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.70057 · Cited by 2
Transparency and Reproducibility: Potential Solutions
Christensen, G., & Miguel, E. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.007 · Cited by 2
Evidens, estetikk og etikk
Hofmann, B. (2022) · Etikk i praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics · doi:10.5324/eip.v16i1.4822 · Cited by 2
Impact Metrics
Gerring, J., Karcher, S., & Apfeld, B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.015 · Cited by 3
Homo Sapiens, Homo Faber and Homo Dictyous. Creatively united by computing science
Mamali, C. (2016) · Filozofia Publiczna i Edukacja Demokratyczna · doi:10.14746/fped.2016.5.2.27 · Cited by 2
What’s Wrong with Replicating the Old Boys’ Networks?
Teele, D. L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.016 · Cited by 2
Die Replikationskrise in der Psychologie
Spitzer, M., & Spitzer, M. (2020) · Nervenheilkunde · doi:10.1055/a-1095-0144 · Cited by 2

Authors: Giner-Sorolla, R.
Affiliations: University of Kent, United Kingdom
Venue: Perspectives on Psychological Science
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Published: 2012-11
Volume: 7
Issue: 6
Pages: 562-571
ISSN: 1745-6916 (ISSN-L)
1745-6924
DOI: 10.1177/1745691612457576
OpenAlex: W2125515636
Cited by: 274
References: 70
Citations by year: 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 5
FWCI: 23.99
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations: Perspectives on Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords: publication bias, replication, scientific fraud, false positives, statistical significance thresholds, information economics, open science, research integrity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks