Cited by 35Crime Patterns and InterventionsUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisCriminal Justice and Penology

Does it look safe? An eye tracking study into the visual aspects of fear of crime

Open access
Crosby, Freya, Hermens, Frouke·2019·Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Abstract

Studies of fear of crime often focus on demographic and social factors, but these can be difficult to change. Studies of visual aspects have suggested that features reflecting incivilities, such as litter, graffiti, and vandalism increase fear of crime, but methods often rely on participants actively mentioning such aspects, and more subtle, less conscious aspects may be overlooked. To address these concerns, this study examined people’s eye movements while they judged scenes for safety. In total, 40 current and former university students were asked to rate images of day-time and night-time scenes of Lincoln, UK (where they studied) and Egham, UK (unfamiliar location) for safety, maintenance, and familiarity while their eye movements were recorded. Another 25 observers not from Lincoln or Egham rated the same images in an Internet survey. Ratings showed a strong association between safety and maintenance and lower safety ratings for night-time scenes for both groups, in agreement with earlier findings. Eye movements of the Lincoln participants showed increased dwell times on buildings, houses, and vehicles during safety judgements and increased dwell times on streets, pavements, and markers of incivilities for maintenance. Results confirm that maintenance plays an important role in perceptions of safety, but eye movements suggest that observers also look for indicators of current or recent presence of people.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1747021818769203

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensing technology can be combined with eye-tracking technology to measure people's perception of safety by examining participants' eye movements and attention-dwell time using eye-tracking devices in a lab-assisted experiment.

    “Sensing technology can also be combined with eye-tracking tech­ nology to measure people's perception of safety by examining partici­ pants' eye movements and attention-dwell time using eye-tracking devices in a lab-assisted experiment (Crosby & Hermens, 2019).”
  • Crosby & Hermens (2019) examined the impact of physical and social factors on participants' visual attention, offering key insights into how people perceive their urban environment and drawing conclusions from the complex spatial decision-making process as people navigate their natural settings.

    “The study examined the impact of physical and social factors on participants' visual attention, offering key insights into how people perceive their urban environment and drawing conclusions from the complex spatial decision-making process as people navigate their natural settings.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crosby, F., & Hermens, F.
Affiliations
University of Lincoln (GB)
Corresponding author
Hermens, Frouke
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2018-06-04
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
599-615
ISSN
  • 0033-555X (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-0218
  • 1747-0226
OpenAlex
W2791412191
Cited by
35
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
Keywords
fear of crime, perceived safety, eye movements, dwell time, urban maintenance, incivility, litter, graffiti, vandalism, familiarity, observer effect
MeSH terms
Adult, Crime, Cues, Eye Movements, Fear, Humans, Judgment, Visual Perception, Eye Movement Measurements, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review