The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015
Abstract
Stroke rehabilitation is a progressive, dynamic, goal-orientated process aimed at enabling a person with impairment to reach their optimal physical, cognitive, emotional, communicative, social and/or functional activity level. After a stroke, patients often continue to require rehabilitation for persistent deficits related to spasticity, upper and lower extremity dysfunction, shoulder and central pain, mobility/gait, dysphagia, vision, and communication. Each year in Canada 62,000 people experience a stroke. Among stroke survivors, over 6500 individuals access in-patient stroke rehabilitation and stay a median of 30 days (inter-quartile range 19 to 45 days). The 2015 update of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Stroke Rehabilitation Practice Guidelines is a comprehensive summary of current evidence-based recommendations for all members of multidisciplinary teams working in a range of settings, who provide care to patients following stroke. These recommendations have been developed to address both the organization of stroke rehabilitation within a system of care (i.e., Initial Rehabilitation Assessment; Stroke Rehabilitation Units; Stroke Rehabilitation Teams; Delivery; Outpatient and Community-Based Rehabilitation), and specific interventions and management in stroke recovery and direct clinical care (i.e., Upper Extremity Dysfunction; Lower Extremity Dysfunction; Dysphagia and Malnutrition; Visual-Perceptual Deficits; Central Pain; Communication; Life Roles). In addition, stroke happens at any age, and therefore a new section has been added to the 2015 update to highlight components of stroke rehabilitation for children who have experienced a stroke, either prenatally, as a newborn, or during childhood. All recommendations have been assigned a level of evidence which reflects the strength and quality of current research evidence available to support the recommendation. The updated Rehabilitation Clinical Practice Guidelines feature several additions that reflect new research areas and stronger evidence for already existing recommendations. It is anticipated that these guidelines will provide direction and standardization for patients, families/caregiver(s), and clinicians within Canada and internationally.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke
Brady, M. C., Kelly, H., Godwin, J., Enderby, P., & Campbell, P. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000425.pub4 · Cited by 1,159
(2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60690-0 · Cited by 789
Incidence and Profile of Inpatient Stroke-Induced Aphasia in Ontario, Canada
Dickey, L., Kagan, A., Lindsay, M. P., Fang, J., Rowland, A., & Black, S. (2010) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.09.020 · Cited by 297
Self-citation
Cited by
Hatem, S. M., Saussez, G., della Faille, M., Prist, V., Zhang, X., Dispa, D., & Bleyenheuft, Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442 · Cited by 918
Cruice, M., Woolf, C., Caute, A., Monnelly, K., Wilson, S., & Marshall, J. (2021) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2020.1795076 · Cited by 34
Allegue, D. R., Higgins, J., Sweet, S. N., Archambault, P. S., Michaud, F., Miller, W., Tousignant, M., & Kairy, D. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.33745 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Hebert, D., Lindsay, M. P., McIntyre, A., Kirton, A., Rumney, P. G., Bagg, S., Bayley, M., Dowlatshahi, D., Dukelow, S., Garnhum, M., Glasser, E., Halabi, M.-L., Kang, E., MacKay-Lyons, M., Martino, R., Rochette, A., Rowe, S., Salbach, N., Semenko, B., Stack, B., Swinton, L., Weber, V., Mayer, M., Verrilli, S., DeVeber, G., Andersen, J., Barlow, K., Cassidy, C., Dilenge, M.-E., Fehlings, D., Hung, R., Iruthayarajah, J., Lenz, L., Majnemer, A., Purtzki, J., Rafay, M., Sonnenberg, L. K., Townley, A., Janzen, S., Foley, N., & Teasell, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Stroke
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-04-14
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 459-484
- ISSN
- 1747-4930 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-4949
- OpenAlex
- W2336933027
- Cited by
- 622
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 52.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1747493016643553
- The paper
- Hebert, D., Lindsay, M. P., McIntyre, A., Kirton, A., Rumney, P. G., Bagg, S., Bayley, M., Dowlatshahi, D., Dukelow, S., Garnhum, M., Glasser, E., Halabi, M.-L., Kang, E., MacKay-Lyons, M., Martino, R., Rochette, A., Rowe, S., Salbach, N., Semenko, B., . . . Teasell, R. (2016). Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. International Journal of Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493016643553
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.