The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable
Open accessAbstract
Finding, testing and demonstrating efficacy of new treatments for stroke recovery is a multifaceted challenge. We believe that to advance the field, neurorehabilitation trials need a conceptually rigorous starting framework. An essential first step is to agree on definitions of sensorimotor recovery and on measures consistent with these definitions. Such standardization would allow pooling of participant data across studies and institutions aiding meta-analyses of completed trials, more detailed exploration of recovery profiles of our patients and the generation of new hypotheses. Here, we present the results of a consensus meeting about measurement standards and patient characteristics that we suggest should be collected in all future stroke recovery trials. Recommendations are made considering time post stroke and are aligned with the international classification of functioning and disability. A strong case is made for addition of kinematic and kinetic movement quantification. Further work is being undertaken by our group to form consensus on clinical predictors and pre-stroke clinical data that should be collected, as well as recommendations for additional outcome measurement tools. To improve stroke recovery trials, we urge the research community to consider adopting our recommendations in their trial design.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8 · Cited by 4,260
Lee, P. H., Macfarlane, D. J., Lam, T., & Stewart, S. M. (2011) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-115 · Cited by 3,370
O'Donnell, M. J., Chin, S. L., Rangarajan, S., Xavier, D., Liu, L., Zhang, H., Rao-Melacini, P., Zhang, X., Pais, P., Agapay, S., et al. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30506-2 · Cited by 2,296
Wolf, S. L., Winstein, C. J., Miller, J. P., Taub, E., Uswatte, G., Morris, D., Giuliani, C., Light, K. E., Nichols-Larsen, D., & EXCITE Investigators, F. T. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.17.2095 · Cited by 1,889
Self-citationBernhardt, J., Hayward, K. S., Kwakkel, G., Ward, N. S., Wolf, S. L., Borschmann, K., Krakauer, J. W., Boyd, L. A., Carmichael, S. T., Corbett, D., et al. (2017) · International Journal of Stroke · doi:10.1177/1747493017711816 · Cited by 1,189
Self-citationCompensatory strategies for reaching in stroke
Cirstea, M. C., & Levin, M. F. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.5.940 · Cited by 1,006
What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke?
Levin, M. F., Kleim, J. A., & Wolf, S. L. (2009) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968308328727 · Cited by 952
Self-citationPhysical Activity and Stroke Risk: A Meta-Analysis
Lee, C. D., Folsom, A. R., & Blair, S. N. (2003) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000091843.02517.9d · Cited by 829
Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking
Keeney, R. L. (1996) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctv322v4g7 · Cited by 776
Patterson, K. K., Gage, W. H., Brooks, D., Black, S. E., & McIlroy, W. E. (2010) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.014 · Cited by 740
Cited by
Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation
Stinear, C. M., Lang, C. E., Zeiler, S., & Byblow, W. D. (2020) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30415-6 · Cited by 792
Feigin, V. L., Owolabi, M. O., Feigin, V. L., Abd-Allah, F., Akinyemi, R. O., Bhattacharjee, N. V., Brainin, M., Cao, J., Caso, V., Dalton, B., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00277-6 · Cited by 804
Self-citationA Critical Time Window for Recovery Extends beyond One-Year Post-Stroke
Ballester, B. R., Maier, M., Duff, A., Cameirão, M., Bermúdez, S., Duarte, E., Cuxart, A., Rodríguez, S., San Segundo Mozo, R. M., & Verschure, P. F. M. J. (2019) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00762.2018 · Cited by 184
Balestra, N., Sharma, G., Riek, L. M., & Busza, A. (2021) · Digital Biomarkers · doi:10.1159/000516619 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwakkel, G., Lannin, N. A., Borschmann, K., English, C., Ali, M., Churilov, L., Saposnik, G., Winstein, C., van Wegen, E. E., Wolf, S. L., Krakauer, J. W., & Bernhardt, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Stroke
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 451-461
- ISSN
- 1747-4930 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-4949
- OpenAlex
- W2734647161
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 35.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1747493017711813
- The paper
- Kwakkel, G., Lannin, N. A., Borschmann, K., English, C., Ali, M., Churilov, L., Saposnik, G., Winstein, C., van Wegen, E. E., Wolf, S. L., Krakauer, J. W., & Bernhardt, J. (2017). Standardized measurement of sensorimotor recovery in stroke trials: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. International Journal of Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017711813
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
