Cited by 184Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesMotor Control and Adaptation

A Critical Time Window for Recovery Extends beyond One-Year Post-Stroke

Open access
Ballester, Belén Rubio, Maier, Martina, Duff, Armin, Cameirão, Mónica, Bermúdez, Sergi, Duarte, Esther, Cuxart, Ampar, Rodríguez, Susana +2 more·2019·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

The impact of rehabilitation on post-stroke motor recovery and its dependency on the patient’s chronicity remain unclear. The field has widely accepted the notion of a proportional recovery rule with a “critical window for recovery” within the first 3–6 mo poststroke. This hypothesis justifies the general cessation of physical therapy at chronic stages. However, the limits of this critical window have, so far, been poorly defined. In this analysis, we address this question, and we further explore the temporal structure of motor recovery using individual patient data from a homogeneous sample of 219 individuals with mild to moderate upper-limb hemiparesis. We observed that improvement in body function and structure was possible even at late chronic stages. A bootstrapping analysis revealed a gradient of enhanced sensitivity to treatment that extended beyond 12 mo poststroke. Clinical guidelines for rehabilitation should be revised in the context of this temporal structure. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous studies in humans suggest that there is a 3- to 6-mo “critical window” of heightened neuroplasticity poststroke. We analyze the temporal structure of recovery in patients with hemiparesis and uncover a precise gradient of enhanced sensitivity to treatment that expands far beyond the limits of the so-called critical window. These findings highlight the need for providing therapy to patients at the chronic and late chronic stages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00762.2018

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ballester, B. R., Maier, M., Duff, A., Cameirão, M., Bermúdez, S., Duarte, E., Cuxart, A., Rodríguez, S., San Segundo Mozo, R. M., & Verschure, P. F. M. J.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (ES)
  • Universidade da Madeira (PT)
  • Madeira Interactive Technologies Institute and Universidade da Madeira, Campus Universitário da Penteada, Funchal, Portugal
  • Hospital de l'Esperança (ES)
  • Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
  • Servei de Medicina Física i Rehabilitació, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
  • Servei de Medicina Física i Rehabilitació, Hospital Joan XIII, Tarragona, Spain
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Corresponding author
Verschure, Paul F. M. J.
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2019-07-01
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
350-357
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2947148718
Cited by
184
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
FWCI
12.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • EC H2020 (H2020EU.1.2.2. 641321)
  • MINECO (TIN201344200REC)
  • AAL Joint Program (Rehabilitation Gaming System)
  • ERC (CDAC 341196)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
stroke, motor recovery, critical time window, upper limb hemiparesis, chronic stroke, rehabilitation timing, treatment sensitivity, neuroplasticity, physiotherapy
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Movement, Neuronal Plasticity, Paresis, Time, Recovery of Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review