The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Worlds, Fields and Networks: Becker, Bourdieu and the Structures of Social Relations
Open accessAbstract
This paper reflects upon Bourdieu’s concept of cultural fields, Becker’s concept of ‘art worlds’ and the concept of networks as developed in social network analysis. We challenge the distinction that Bourdieu makes between the objective ‘relations’ and ‘positions’ constitutive of ‘social space’ and visible social relationships. In contrast, we maintain that interaction is generative of social spaces and positions and should be integral to any account of them. Becker’s position is better from this perspective, but while Becker refers repeatedly to social networks, he fails to develop the concept or exploit its potential as a means of exploring social structures. Both Becker and Bourdieu have an underdeveloped conception of social connection which weakens their respective conceptions of the space of cultural production. Our proposed remedy is to use social network analysis to derive ‘positions’ and ‘relations’ between ‘positions’, as prioritized by Bourdieu, from data on concrete interactions and relations. This allows ‘world’ analysis to speak to the issues of field analysis without sacrificing its strengths. We illustrate our case by way of an analysis of two UK music scenes from the late 1970s.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While Bourdieu initially criticized network approaches, Bottero and Crossley (2011) have shown that it is possible to combine networks with data on concrete interactions and relations, to derive actors’ positions in the sense of Bourdieu.”
From The agroecological transition in Senegal: transnational links and uneven empowerment (2022) · cites this paper as Bottero and Crossley 2011
Citations
Cites
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1086/230603 · DOI
- 10.2307/2094151 · DOI
- Becker, H., 1982, Art Worlds
- 10.1007/s11206-006-9018-2 · DOI
- Becker, H., 2009, Grenoble.
- Borgatti, S.P., 2002, Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis
- Bott, E., 1957, Family and Social Network
- Bottero, W., British Journal of Sociology, 60, 309
- 10.1177/1749975509356750 · DOI
- Bourdieu, P., 1984, Distinction
- 10.1007/BF00174048 · DOI
- Bourdieu, P. ( 1987) ‘Legitimation and Structured Interests in Weber’s Sociology of Religion’, in S. Lash and S. Whimster (eds) Max Weber, Rationality and Modernity, pp. 119-36. London: Routledge.
- Bourdieu, P., 1993, The Field of Cultural Production
- 10.1515/9781503615861 · DOI
- Bourdieu, P., 1996, Homo Academicus
- Bourdieu, P., 1998, Practical Reason
- Bourdieu, P., 1992, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology
- 10.1093/oso/9780199249145.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/201913 · DOI
- Coleman, J., 1990, Foundations of Social Theory
- 10.1177/0263276408095546 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00204.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.poetic.2008.10.002 · DOI
- Crossley, N., 2010, Sociologica, 1
- Crossley, N., ‘Networks, Interactions and Complexity’
- 10.1016/S0304-422X(03)00035-4 · DOI
- 10.1177/205979910900400105 · DOI
- 10.1525/si.1983.6.1.97 · DOI
- 10.1525/si.1983.6.1.97 · DOI
- Fowler, B., 1997, Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Theory
- 10.1177/026858089004002002 · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226041056.003.0007 · DOI
- Milroy, L., 1987, Language and Social Networks
- Scott, J., 2000, Social Network Analysis
- 10.1086/221630 · DOI
- Simmel, G., 1955, Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations
- Wellman, B., 1997, Social Structures: A Network Approach
- White, H., 1992, Identity and Control
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The agroecological transition in Senegal: transnational links and uneven empowerment
Boillat, S., Belmin, R., & Bottazzi, P. (2022) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-021-10247-5 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Bottero, W., & Crossley, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bottero, Wendy
- Venue
- Cultural Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-01-31
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-119
- ISSN
- 1749-9755 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-9763
- OpenAlex
- W2100691224
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 34.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Cultural Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/H010769/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Capital and Social Class
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music History and Culture
- Keywords
- Erving Goffman, Pierre Bourdieu, art world, cultural field, social networks, social space, social status, interpersonal relationships, interaction, social connectedness, cultural production, music scene, 1970s music
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review