Cited by 221Linguistics and Discourse AnalysisDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesMedia Discourse and Social Analysis

Towards a pragma-linguistic framework for the study of sensationalism in news headlines

Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna·2013·Discourse & Communication

Abstract

This article sets out a framework for a language-oriented analysis of sensationalism in news media. Sensationalism is understood here as a discourse strategy of ‘packaging’ information in news headlines in such a way that news items are presented as more interesting, extraordinary and relevant than might be the case. Unlike previous content analyses of sensational coverage, this study demonstrates how sensationalism is instantiated through specific illocutions, semantic macrostructures, narrative formulas, evaluation parameters, and interpersonal and textual devices. Examples are drawn from a corpus of headlines of the ‘most read’ articles in the online outlet of the British mid-market tabloid Daily Mail compiled in early 2012. Sensationalized instances are identified through surveys and focus group discussions and subsequently analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. The study is located within the context of media scholarship on news values and current trends in journalism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1750481312471668

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensationalism in journalism is associated with dramatic presentation, emotional appeals, moral polarization, and prioritization of shock or curiosity over proportionality.

    “It has long been associated with dramatic presentation, emotional appeals, moral polarization, and the prioritization of shock or curiosity over proportionality (Molek-Kozakowska, 2013;Vettehen et al., 2008).”

    From Sensational Headlines, Engagement, and Credibility in Nepal’s Online News (2025) · cites this paper as Molek-Kozakowska, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molek-Kozakowska, K.
Affiliations
Opole University, Poland
Venue
Discourse & Communication
Published
2013-04-22
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
173-197
ISSN
  • 1750-4813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-4821
OpenAlex
W2046592476
Cited by
221
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
43.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Discourse & Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Discourse and Social Analysis
Keywords
sensationalism, news headlines, illocution, semantic macrostructures, narrative formula, evaluation, textual devices, news values, Daily Mail, tabloid journalism, online news

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review