The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hepatic uptake and deacylation of the LPS in bloodborne LPS-lipoprotein complexes
Abstract
Much evidence indicates that bacterial LPS (endotoxin) is removed from the bloodstream mainly by the liver, yet the hepatic uptake mechanisms remain uncertain and controversial. In plasma, LPS can be either ‘free’ (as aggregates, bacterial membrane fragments or loosely bound to albumin, CD14, or other proteins) or ‘bound’ (complexed with lipoproteins). Whereas most free LPS is taken up by Kupffer cells (KCs), lipoprotein-bound LPS has seemed to be cleared principally by hepatocytes. Here, we compared the liver’s ability to take up and deacylate free LPS aggregates and the LPS in preformed LPS-high density lipoprotein (HDL) complexes. In mice examined from 1 h to 7 d after a small amount of fluorescent (FITC-)LPS was injected into a lateral tail vein, we found FITC-LPS almost entirely within, or adjacent to, KCs. As expected, FITC-LPS complexed with HDL (FITC-LPS-HDL) disappeared more slowly from the circulation and a smaller fraction of the injected dose of FITC-LPS was found in the liver. Unexpectedly, the FITC-LPS injected as FITC-LPS-HDL complexes was also found within sinusoids, adjacent to, or within, KCs. In other experiments, we found that both free and HDL-bound radiolabeled LPS underwent enzymatic deacylation by acyloxyacyl hydrolase (AOAH), the LPS-inactivating enzyme that is principally produced within the liver by KCs. Our observations suggest that KCs and AOAH play important roles in clearing and catabolizing both free LPS and the LPS in circulating LPS-HDL complexes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LPS-binding protein can transfer LPS to CD14 to initiate inflammatory Toll-like receptor 4/myeloid differentiation factor 2 signaling.
“LPS-binding protein, which can transfer LPS to CD14 to initiate inflammatory Toll-like receptor 4/myeloid differentiation factor 2 signaling”
From Lipidome and proteome of astrocyte and microglia ApoE lipoprotein reveal differences based on cell type and ApoE isoform (2026) · cites this paper as [100]
The Introduction (page unavailable) says LPS-binding protein largely mediates LPS binding to lipoproteins. It does not say that the protein transfers LPS to CD14 or thereby initiates inflammatory TLR4/MD2 signaling; the References mention CD14/TLR4/MD2 only in connection with LPS uptake by hepatocytes. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLPS-binding protein becomes anti-inflammatory when associated with ApoA1-containing HDL.
“becomes anti-inflammatory when associated with ApoA1-containing HDL (69, 99, 100).”
From Lipidome and proteome of astrocyte and microglia ApoE lipoprotein reveal differences based on cell type and ApoE isoform (2026) · cites this paper as [100]
The Introduction (page unavailable) says LPS-binding protein helps mediate LPS binding to lipoproteins and that lipoprotein-bound LPS is less able to stimulate cells. The Methods (page unavailable) report reduced macrophage IL-6 production from LPS-HDL complexes. Neither passage says LPS-binding protein itself becomes anti-inflammatory when associated with ApoA1-containing HDL. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chylomicrons promote intestinal absorption of lipopolysaccharides
Ghoshal, S., Witta, J., Zhong, J., de Villiers, W., & Eckhardt, E. (2009) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.m800156-jlr200 · Cited by 662
Cai, L., Ji, A., de Beer, F. C., Tannock, L. R., & van der Westhuyzen, D. R. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci31539 · Cited by 167
Rensen, P. C., Oosten, M., Bilt, E., Eck, M., Kuiper, J., & Berkel, T. J. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci119427 · Cited by 113
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.4049/jimmunol.123.5.2133 · DOI
- Freudenberg MA, 1982, Br J Exp Pathol, 63, 56
- 10.1093/infdis/169.1.95 · DOI
- 10.1086/514127 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02890437 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M609462200 · DOI
- 10.1002/hep.24488 · DOI
- 10.1002/hep.1840190525 · DOI
- Yasui M, 1995, Hepatogastroenterology, 42, 683
- 10.1016/S0344-0338(11)80438-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0016-5085(81)80009-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0344-0338(85)80193-X · DOI
- 10.1177/09680519010070050601 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M803905200 · DOI
- 10.1002/hep.22839 · DOI
- 10.2220/biomedres.26.99 · DOI
- 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90765-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1532-0456(01)00207-1 · DOI
- 10.1128/IAI.34.3.835-843.1981 · DOI
- 10.1194/jlr.M300228-JLR200 · DOI
- 10.4049/jimmunol.131.4.1913 · DOI
- 10.1128/IAI.68.5.2410-2417.2000 · DOI
- 10.1172/JCI110404 · DOI
- 10.1002/hep.510270521 · DOI
- 10.1128/IAI.58.7.2375-2382.1990 · DOI
- 10.1128/IAI.61.12.5140-5146.1993 · DOI
- 10.1002/jlb.47.2.97 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2776(09)03002-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chom.2008.06.009 · DOI
- 10.1038/ni1246 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0009-9120(02)00330-2 · DOI
- Poelstra K, 1997, Lab Invest, 76, 319
- 10.1007/s10620-010-1396-x · DOI
- Goldberg RF, Austen Jr WG, Zhang X, Munene G, Mostafa G, Biswas S, et al. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase is a gut mucosal defense factor maintained by enteral nutrition. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2008; 0712140105. · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1969.tb00601.x · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M302921200 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.274.48.34116 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.20030420 · DOI
- 10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1219 · DOI
- 10.2337/db07-1403 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01399.x · DOI
- 10.3748/wjg.v16.i11.1321 · DOI
- 10.1038/nm1511 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Endotoxemia—menace, marker, or mistake?
Munford, R. S. (2016) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.3ru0316-151r · Cited by 219
Self-citationStrickland, M. R., Wang, Z., Golden, L. R., Wang, H., Lu, P., Ren, Y., Tabor, G. T., Zhao, N., Ulrich, J. D., Han, X., et al. (2026) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.jlr.2026.101000 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Shao, B., Munford, R. S., Kitchens, R., & Varley, A. W.
- Affiliations
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Venue
- Innate Immunity
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-03-22
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 825-833
- ISSN
- 1753-4259
- 1753-4267
- PMC
- PMC4120711
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review