Cited by 22Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsHelicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies

Proton-pump inhibitors for the treatment of functional dyspepsia

Open access
Suzuki, Hidekazu, Okada, Sawako, Hibi, Toshifumi·2011·Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology

Abstract

In the Rome III classification, functional dyspepsia (FD) has been further subcategorized into two different syndromes, namely, epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) and postprandial distress syndrome (PDS). Acid-related pathophysiology seems to be mainly responsible for EPS, and antisecretory agents such as proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) seem to be effective mainly against EPS. However, recent information as to the relationship between initial duodenal acid sensitization in the early postprandial phase and delayed gastric emptying in the later postprandial phase would suggest the amelioration of PDS by antisecretory agents. In the present review, we summarized the recent literature on the direct and indirect effect of PPIs in FD (including not only Rome III, but also Rome II criteria). The effects of PPIs against FD are heterogeneous, depending on the protocol of the clinical studies, and the inclusion criteria of each randomized controlled trial (primary care or tertiary care population). As the placebo effects cannot be ignored in this disease, a placebo-controlled study would be necessary, at least for the evaluation of the effect of each agent on symptom relief in patients with FD. Further studies directly comparing PPIs with suitable placebos in terms of their effects in reducing the symptoms of endoscopically confirmed, Rome III-based FD are awaited.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1756283x11398735

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PPIs are the first-choice treatment for acid-related disorders such as bleeding, peptic ulcers, gastroesophageal reflux, erosive esophagitis (ERD) and certain dyspepsia subtypes.

    “PPIs are the first-choice treatment for acid-related disorders such as bleeding, peptic ulcers, gastroesophageal reflux, erosive esophagitis (ERD) and certain dyspepsia subtypes[2-5].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suzuki, H., Okada, S., & Hibi, T.
Affiliations
  • Keio University (JP)
  • Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Corresponding author
Suzuki, Hidekazu
Venue
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Published
2011-03-02
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
219-226
ISSN
  • 1756-283X (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-2848
OpenAlex
W2128987347
Cited by
22
References
23
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Keio University
  • Smoking Research Foundation
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22300169)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies
Keywords
proton pump inhibitors, functional dyspepsia, epigastric pain syndrome, postprandial distress syndrome, antisecretory therapy, duodenal acid secretion, delayed gastric emptying, placebo effect, symptom relief

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review