Cited by 36Neurological disorders and treatmentsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Emerging strategies in the management of essential tremor

Open access
Hedera, Peter·2017·Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders

Abstract

Currently available therapies for essential tremor (ET) provide sufficient control only for less than a half of patients and many unmet needs exist. This is in part due to the empiric nature of existing treatment options and persisting uncertainties about the pathogenesis of ET. The emerging concept of ET as a possible neurodegenerative disorder, better understanding of associated biochemical changes, including alterations in the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic system and gap junctions, and the identification of the role of the leucine-rich repeat and immunoglobulin-like domain-containing 1 (LINGO-1) gene in ET pathogenesis suggest new avenues for more targeted therapies. Here we review the most promising new approaches to treating ET, including allosteric modulation of GABA receptors and modifications of the LINGO-1 pathway. Medically refractory tremor can be successfully treated by high-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus, but surgical therapies are also fraught with limitations due to adverse effects of stimulation and the loss of therapeutic response. The selection of additional thalamic and extrathalamic targets for electrode placements and the development of a closed-loop DBS system enabling automatic adjustment of stimulation parameters in response to changes in electrophysiologic brain activity are also reviewed. Tremor cancellation methods using exoskeleton and external hand-held devices are also briefly discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1756285616679123

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increasing stimulation intensity to maintain the therapeutic effect may cause side effects such as unpleasant sensations, slurred speech, and walking unsteadiness.

    “In these circumstances, an increased stimulation intensity is usually required in order to maintain the therapy effect, which may be associated with side effects including unpleasant sensations, slurred speech and unsteadiness walking [5].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 89 · Cited by 36

Authors
Hedera, P.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Hedera, Peter
Venue
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
Published
2016-11-30
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
137-148
ISSN
  • 1756-2856 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-2864
OpenAlex
W2558847336
Cited by
36
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Keywords
essential tremor, deep brain stimulation, ventral intermediate nucleus, LINGO-1, GABAergic system, gap junctions, closed-loop stimulation, medically refractory tremor, exoskeleton, neurodegeneration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review