Cited by 137Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationICT in Developing CommunitiesElectronic Health Records Systems

ICT Applications as E-Health Solutions in Rural Healthcare in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa

Ruxwana, Nkqubela L, Herselman, Marlien E, Conradie, D Pieter·2010·Health Information Management Journal

Abstract

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) solutions (e.g. e-health, telemedicine, e-education) are often viewed as vehicles to bridge the digital divide between rural and urban healthcare centres and to resolve shortcomings in the rural health sector. This study focused on factors perceived to influence the uptake and use of ICTs as e-health solutions in selected rural Eastern Cape healthcare centres, and on structural variables relating to these facilities and processes. Attention was also given to two psychological variables that may underlie an individual's acceptance and use of ICTs: usefulness and ease of use. Recommendations are made with regard to how ICTs can be used more effectively to improve health systems at five rural healthcare centres where questionnaire and interview data were collected: St. Lucy's Hospital, Nessie Knight Hospital, the Tsilitwa Clinic, the Madzikane Ka-Zulu Memorial Hospital and the Nelson Mandela General Hospital.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/183335831003900104

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within studies applying TAM, factors influential to health care providers' acceptance of eHealth included perceived usefulness and needs, perceived ease of use, and all facilitating or inhibiting conditions.

    “Within these studies [25,29,41,42,75,77,79,81,83-85,87,88,102], the factors influential to health care providers’ acceptance of eHealth included their perceived usefulness and needs, perceived ease of use, and all of the facilitating or inhibiting conditions.”
  • Few studies have successfully tested the applicability of the UTAUT model by Venkatesh et al.

    “Few studies (eg, [41]) have successfully tested the applicability of the UTAUT model by Venkatesh et al [21].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruxwana, N. L., Herselman, M. E., & Conradie, D. P.
Affiliations
  • Tshwane University of Technology (ZA)
  • Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (ZA)
Corresponding author
  • Ruxwana, Nkqubela L
  • Herselman, Marlien E
  • Conradie, D Pieter
Venue
Health Information Management Journal
Published
2010-03
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
17-29
ISSN
  • 1833-3583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1833-3575
OpenAlex
W1812109890
Cited by
137
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Information Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
Keywords
e-health, ICT adoption, rural health care, telemedicine, digital divide, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, technology acceptance, Eastern Cape, health information systems
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Computers, Computer Communication Networks, Computer Literacy, Computers, Humans, Medical Informatics, South Africa, Telemedicine, Rural Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review