Cited by 26Medical Coding and Health InformationAutopsy Techniques and OutcomesNursing Diagnosis and Documentation

Impact of documentation errors on accuracy of cause of death coding in an educational hospital in Southern Iran

Haghighi, Mohammad Hosein Hayavi, Dehghani, Mohammad, Teshizi, Saeid Hoseini, Mahmoodi, Hamid·2014·Health Information Management Journal

Abstract

Accurate cause of death coding leads to organised and usable death information but there are some factors that influence documentation on death certificates and therefore affect the coding. We reviewed the role of documentation errors on the accuracy of death coding at Shahid Mohammadi Hospital (SMH), Bandar Abbas, Iran. We studied the death certificates of all deceased patients in SMH from October 2010 to March 2011. Researchers determined and coded the underlying cause of death on the death certificates according to the guidelines issued by the World Health Organization in Volume 2 of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems-10 th revision (ICD-10). Necessary ICD coding rules (such as the General Principle, Rules 1–3, the modification rules and other instructions about death coding) were applied to select the underlying cause of death on each certificate. Demographic details and documentation errors were then extracted. Data were analysed with descriptive statistics and chi square tests. The accuracy rate of causes of death coding was 51.7%, demonstrating a statistically significant relationship (p=.001) with major errors but not such a relationship with minor errors. Factors that result in poor quality of Cause of Death coding in SMH are lack of coder training, documentation errors and the undesirable structure of death certificates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/183335831404300205

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haghighi, M. H. H., Dehghani, M., Teshizi, S. H., & Mahmoodi, H.
Affiliations
  • Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Saeid Hoseini Teshizi, MBiostat, Biostatistician, Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedical School, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, IRAN
Venue
Health Information Management Journal
Published
2014-06
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
34-42
ISSN
  • 1833-3583 (ISSN-L)
  • 1833-3575
OpenAlex
W2261052049
Cited by
26
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Information Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Keywords
cause of death coding, documentation errors, death certificates, ICD-10, coding accuracy, clinical documentation, coder training, educational hospitals
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cause of Death, Death Certificates, Female, Hospital Records, Hospitals, Teaching, Humans, Iran, Male, Middle Aged, World Health Organization, International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Coding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review