Cited by 30AI in Service InteractionsArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsDigital Innovation in Industries

Artificial Intelligence, Marketing, and the History of Technology: Kranzberg’s Laws as a Conceptual Lens

Pitt, Christine, Paschen, Jeannette, Kietzmann, Jan, Pitt, Leyland F., Pala, Erol·2023·Australasian Marketing Journal

Abstract

Killer applications, or killer apps, are technology applications that profoundly change the way any society thinks, works, and functions. This paper explores Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a killer app, with specific application to marketing. Specifically, this paper employs the lens of technology history to explore the relationship between marketing and AI. Using Kranzberg’s six laws of technology, this paper sheds light on all manner of innovations, how technologies have shaped and impacted society, and how marketers can respond to this. This inquiry offers two main contributions: First, it suggests a number of implications for marketing practice and scholars, derived from each of Kranzberg’s laws. These suggestions are intended to guide marketing practice when implementing or using AI. In addition, this article offers a number of research directions that might be fruitful and important areas for investigation in future scholarly work regarding technology’s impact among marketing scholars.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/18393349211044175

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kranzberg's historical laws seem to still stand true.

    “For those of who have studied the role of technology in education and society, the historical laws of Kranzberg seem to still stand true (Pitt et al., 2021).”

    From The Future of Artificial Intelligence in Special Education Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Pitt et al., 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pitt, C., Paschen, J., Kietzmann, J., Pitt, L. F., & Pala, E.
Affiliations
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
  • Kwantlen Polytechnic University (CA)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Corresponding author
Kietzmann, Jan
Venue
Australasian Marketing Journal
Published
2021-09-22
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
81-89
ISSN
  • 1441-3582 (ISSN-L)
  • 1839-3349
OpenAlex
W3200383882
Cited by
30
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
Keywords
artificial intelligence, marketing, killer apps, history of technology, technology adoption, technology and society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review