Cited by 28Technology Adoption and User BehaviourE-Government and Public ServicesSmart Cities and Technologies

Acceptance of cloud computing in the Malaysian public sector: A proposed model

Open access
Amron, Mohd Talmizie, Ibrahim, Roslina, Bakar, Nur Azaliah Abu, Chuprat, Suriayati·2019·International Journal of Engineering Business Management

Abstract

The Malaysian government has initiated a cloud government project as an integration of cloud computing and unified communication-based applications toward the digital and cloud work environment. However, the impact studies have found that the implementation of this project has several weaknesses such as lack of infrastructure support, weak IT knowledge, and lack of awareness among public sector employees causing applications not to be fully utilized. Therefore, it is crucial to conduct a study to measure the acceptance of government cloud project because there has been much investment in the project. This study applied Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), Technology Readiness Index (TRI) and several factors to develop the research model which is divided into two main factors: technological and human. The technological factor might determine the likelihood of its acceptance by the public sector and might stimulate them to accept it. The human factor as the characteristics of the people in the public sector that may contribute to creating the need for and ability to accept cloud computing. This proposed model will be used to evaluate the individual acceptance of cloud computing in the Malaysian public sector. For future work, this model needs to be enriched with interview sessions and quantitative surveys to validate the findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1847979019880709

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amron, M. T., Ibrahim, R., Bakar, N. A. A., & Chuprat, S.
Affiliations
University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Amron, Mohd Talmizie
Venue
International Journal of Engineering Business Management
Published
2019-01-01
Volume
11
ISSN
1847-9790 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996829554
Cited by
28
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Engineering Business Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
Keywords
cloud computing adoption, public sector, UTAUT, Technology Readiness Index, technology acceptance, Malaysian public sector, unified communications, IT infrastructure, employee awareness, technology readiness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review