Cited by 30Electronic Health Records SystemsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

The Added Value of Log File Analyses of the Use of a Personal Health Record for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Preliminary Results

Open access
Sieverink, Floor, Kelders, Saskia M., Braakman-Jansen, Louise M. A., van Gemert-Pijnen, Julia E. W. C.·2014·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Background: The electronic personal health record (PHR) is a promising technology for improving the quality of chronic disease management. Until now, evaluations of such systems have provided only little insight into why a particular outcome occurred. The aim of this study is to gain insight into the navigation process (what functionalities are used, and in what sequence) of e-Vita, a PHR for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), to increase the efficiency of the system and improve the long-term adherence. Method: Log data of the first visits in the first 6 weeks after the release of a renewed version of e-Vita were analyzed to identify the usage patterns that emerge when users explore a new application. Results: After receiving the invitation, 28% of all registered users visited e-Vita. In total, 70 unique usage patterns could be identified. When users visited the education service first, 93% of all users ended their session. Most users visited either 1 or 5 or more services during their first session, but the distribution of the routes was diffuse. Conclusions: In conclusion, log file analyses can provide valuable prompts for improving the system design of a PHR. In this way, the match between the system and its users and the long-term adherence has the potential to increase.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1932296814525696

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a previous study, users of a personal health record followed the global menu structure when exploring the PHR for the first time, and most users were likely to drop out when they visited the education section as a first step after the first login.

    “For example, in a previous study we found that users of a personal health record (PHR), an electronic application consisting of different tools for monitoring and coaching patients with chronic conditions to support self-management [22], followed the global menu structure when exploring the PHR for the first time. Furthermore, most users were likely to drop out when they visited the education sect”
  • Users followed the structure of the system in first visits to the PHR for patients with chronic conditions.

    “The results showed that users followed the structure of the system.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sieverink, F., Kelders, S. M., Braakman-Jansen, L. M. A., & van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. W. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Twente (NL)
  • Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, Center for eHealth Research and Disease Management, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2014-03
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
247-255
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170307054
Cited by
30
References
20
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
personal health records, type 2 diabetes, log analysis, user navigation behavior, patient adherence, chronic disease management, system design improvement, patient education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review