Cited by 71

Adhesives Used for Diabetes Medical Devices: A Neglected Risk With Serious Consequences?

Heinemann, Lutz, Kamann, Stefanie·2016·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1932296816662949

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For users of both CSII and CGM technologies, the combined application and intervals of device change can be burdensome because of numerous adhesive patch removals and increased risk of skin irritation, skin reactions, or adhesive tape allergies, with minimal days for recovery.

    “Thus, for users of both CSII and CGM technologies, the combined application and intervals of device change can be burdensome because of numerous adhesive patch removals and increased risk of skin irritation,5,6 skin reactions,5,6 or adhesive tape allergies,7 with minimal days for recovery.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heinemann, L., & Kamann, S.
Affiliations
Science & Co, Düsseldorf, Germany
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2016-09-25
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
1211-1215
ISSN
1932-2968
Cited by
71
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review