Cited by 30Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityInterpreting and Communication in Healthcare

The Spanish Availability and Readability of Diabetes Apps

Open access
Rodriguez, Jorge A., Singh, Karandeep·2018·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Background: There is growing evidence supporting the use of mobile health apps for the management of diabetes. Given the disproportionate impact of diabetes on Latinos, especially those with limited English proficiency (LEP) and low literacy, diabetes apps have the potential to address existing health disparities. Our study aimed to understand the current accessibility of diabetes apps for these populations. Methods: We searched the Android and iOS stores for the term “diabetes” to identify patient-facing diabetes apps. We reviewed the app store descriptions and user interfaces for Spanish availability. We assessed the readability of the descriptions in English and Spanish using the Lexile Analyzer and the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Grade Level. Results: Overall, in reviewing both app stores, 30% (28/92) of apps had descriptions available in Spanish, of which 41% (18/44) of Android apps were available in Spanish and 21% (10/48) iOS apps were available in Spanish. In addition, the readability of 94% (90/96) for the app store descriptions was above the recommended reading level for patient education material in English and Spanish. The overall kappa coefficient for app translation quality assessment was .72, reflecting moderate interrater agreement. Conclusions: Despite the evidence supporting the use of diabetes apps, they do not cater to the language needs of LEP Latino patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1932296817749610

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodriguez, J. A., & Singh, K.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Rodriguez, Jorge A.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2018-01-02
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
719-724
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2782127036
Cited by
30
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of Diversity and Inclusion
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
diabetes apps, mobile health, readability, limited English proficiency, Hispanic patients, health disparities, translation quality, patient education materials, low literacy
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Language, Patient Education as Topic, Comprehension, Health Literacy, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review