Cited by 41Pharmaceutical Economics and PolicyDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Real-World Evidence Should Be Used in Regulatory Decisions About New Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Products for Diabetes

Open access
Klonoff, David C., Gutierrez, Alberto, Fleming, Alexander, Kerr, David·2019·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are no longer the sole source of data to inform guidelines, regulatory, and policy decisions. Real-world data (RWD), collected from registries, electronic health records, insurance claims, pharmacy records, social media, and sensor outputs from devices form real-world evidence (RWE), which can supplement evidence from RCTs. Benefits of using RWE include less time and cost to produce meaningful data; the ability to capture additional information, including social determinants of health that can impact health outcomes; detection of uncommon adverse events; and the potential to apply machine learning and artificial intelligence to the delivery of health care. Overall, combining data from RCTs and RWE would allow regulators to make ongoing and more evidence-based decisions in approving and monitoring products for diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1932296819839996

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, which reduced the introduction of bias associated with nonrandomized studies but limits the generalizability of the findings in the real world.

    “As well, only RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Although this reduced the introduction of bias associated with nonrandomized studies, it does limit the generalizability of the findings in the real world [53].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klonoff, D. C., Gutierrez, A., Fleming, A., & Kerr, D.
Affiliations
  • Mills Peninsula Health Services (US)
  • NDA Partners LLC, Bethesda, MD, USA
  • Kinexum, Harper’s Ferry, WV, USA
  • Sansum Diabetes Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Kerr, David
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2019-04-03
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
995-1000
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2932598518
Cited by
41
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Sanofi
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
real-world evidence, real-world data, regulatory decision-making, diabetes mellitus, pharmaceutical products, medical devices, randomized controlled trials, social determinants of health, adverse event detection, machine learning, artificial intelligence, drug approval, post-market monitoring
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Diabetes Mellitus, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Equipment and Supplies, Health Policy, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Device Approval, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review