Cited by 28Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Effects of a dedicated inpatient diabetes management service on glycemic control in a community hospital setting

Open access
Demidowich, Andrew P., Batty, Kristine, Love, Teresa, Sokolinsky, Sam, Grubb, Lisa, Miller, Catherine, Raymond, Larry, Nazarian, Jeanette +3 more·2021·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

Background Community hospitals account for over 84% of all hospitals and over 94% of hospital admissions in the United States. In academic settings, implementation of an Inpatient Diabetes Management Service (IDMS) model of care has been shown to reduce rates of hyper- and hypoglycemia, hospital length of stay (LOS), and associated hospital costs. However, few studies to date have evaluated the implementation of a dedicated IDMS in a community hospital setting. Methods This retrospective study examined the effects of changing the model of inpatient diabetes consultations from a local, private endocrine practice to a full-time endocrine hospitalist on glycemic control, LOS, and 30-day readmission rates in a 267-bed community hospital. Results Overall diabetes patient days for the hospital were similar pre- and post-intervention (20,191 vs 20,262); however, the volume of patients seen by IDMS increased significantly after changing models. Rates of hyperglycemia decreased both among patients seen by IDMS (53.8% to 42.5%, P P P = .02); no such time effect was seen prior to IDMS ( P = .34). LOS and 30DRR were not significantly different between IDMS models. Conclusions Implementation of an endocrine hospitalist-based IDMS at a community hospital was associated with significantly decreased hyperglycemia, while avoiding concurrent increases in hypoglycemia. Further studies are needed to investigate whether these effects are associated with improvements in clinical outcomes, patient…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1932296821993198

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Care provided by appropriately trained specialists or specialty teams may reduce the length of stay and improve glycemic and other clinical outcomes.

    “Care provided by appropriately trained specialists or specialty teams may reduce the length of stay and improve glycemic and other clinical outcomes (15)(16)(17).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Demidowich, A. P., Batty, K., Love, T., Sokolinsky, S., Grubb, L., Miller, C., Raymond, L., Nazarian, J., Ahmed, M. S., Rotello, L., & Zilbermint, M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Demidowich, Andrew P.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2021-02-20
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
546-552
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3131270017
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
community hospitals, glycemic control, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission, hospital care delivery
MeSH terms
Glycemic Control, Diabetes Mellitus, Hospitals, Community, Humans, Inpatients, Patient Readmission, Retrospective Studies, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review