Cited by 59Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Digital Technology for Diabetes

Open access
Hughes, Michael S., Addala, Ananta, Buckingham, Bruce·2023·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Monitors to measure glucose levels have been paired with software controlling insulin delivery. The authors examine the state of the art in digital technology to manage diabetes (types 1 and 2).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmra2215899

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CGM helps characterize the timing, amplitude, and frequency of excursions, and provides quantitative metrics such as TIR, time in hypoglycemia (TBR) and hyperglycemia (TAR), and indices of glycemic variability, which are increasingly used as clinically meaningful targets in diabetes management.

    “CGM helps characterize the timing, amplitude, and frequency of excursions [133–139], and provides quantitative metrics such as TIR, time in hypoglycemia (TBR) and hyperglycemia (TAR), and indices of glycemic variability, which are increasingly used as clinically meaningful targets in diabetes management [140–144].”

    From Diabetic gastroparesis: pathophysiology and impact on insulin timing choices (2026) · cites this paper as [138]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, Diabetes technology: standards of care in diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care 2023; 46: Suppl: S111– S127. 36507635 PMC9810474

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, M. S., Addala, A., & Buckingham, B.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2023-11-30
Volume
389
Issue
22
Pages
2076-2086
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4389120388
Cited by
59
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K12DK122550, P30DK116074, K23DK131342)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
diabetes management, digital health technologies, glucose monitoring, continuous glucose monitoring, insulin delivery, insulin pump, artificial pancreas, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes
MeSH terms
Digital Technology, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Technology, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review