Cited by 10Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationTechnology Use by Older AdultsDiabetes Management and Education

Remote research: resources, intervention needs, and methods in people with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy

Open access
Bohnert, Kathryn L., Zellers, Jennifer A., Jeong, Hyo Jung, Chen, Ling, York, Alexa, Hastings, Mary K.·2023·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stay-at-home orders associated with the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic were particularly important for older adults with type 2 diabetes, at risk for severe COVID-19 complications. In response, research shifted to remote telehealth methodology. Study participant interests, equipment needs, and ability to adapt methods to the remote/telehealth environment were unknown. Study purposes to assess (1) resource needs (internet/devices accessibility), (2) future telehealth interests, and (3) ability to adapt common research and clinical measures of glycemic control, physical function, activity measures, and quality of life outcomes to a telehealth setting. METHOD: Twenty-one participants with type 2 diabetes and peripheral neuropathy were recruited from a longitudinal study (11 female; age: 66.3 ± 8.3 years; DM: 15.1 ± 8.7 years). Technology needs and future telehealth interests were assessed. A glycemic measure (HbA1c), a five-times chair rise, a one-week activity monitor, and surveys (self-efficacy, depression, and balance) were collected. All aspects of the study were completed remotely over email and video/phone call. RESULTS: Twelve participants used computers; nine used phones for study completion. Participants had the following resource needs: connectivity (n = 3), devices (n = 6), and technical support (n = 12). Twenty people expressed interest in participating in future telehealth studies related to balance, exercise, and diabetes management. Methodological considerations were primarily the need for assistance for participants to complete the home HbA1c test, five-time chair rise, wearable activity monitoring, and surveys. CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with type 2 diabetes and peripheral neuropathy would need technological and personal assistance (connection, device, guidance) to complete a long-term telehealth intervention. Despite technology needs, participants were interested in telehealth interventions. CLINICAL TRIAL: Parent study, "Metatarsal Phalangeal Joint Deformity Progression-R01 (NCT02616263) is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/19322968221103610

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Through visualized progress trajectories and stage-based summaries of achievement, digital wearable devices may help patients accumulate successful experiences and gradually internalize exercise behavior over time.

    “Through visualized progress trajectories and stage-based summaries of achievement, digital wearable devices may help patients accumulate successful experiences and gradually internalize exercise behavior over time (37).”

    From Behavior change pathways by which digital wearable devices support exercise self-management in type 2 diabetes: a scoping review with machine learning–assisted text mining (2026) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Methods describe a wrist-worn activity monitor used to collect seven days of activity data, and the Results report participants’ steps and activity levels. Neither section addresses visualized progress, achievement summaries, accumulated success, or the internalization of exercise behavior; searches for those concepts and for wearable feedback found no supporting passage. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [15]15. Houck J, Iwanaga T, Kieu C, Lerma K, Murasaki C, Souza T. Validity of the PROMIS physical performance scale in determining frailty and physical ability in community-dwelling elderly. Student-Faculty Research-College of Physical Therapy 40; 2016. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/pt_student/40. [Google Scholar]
  2. [23]23. McBride G. A proposal for strength-of-agreement criteria for Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient. NIWA Client Rep. 2005;45:307-310. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bohnert, K. L., Zellers, J. A., Jeong, H. J., Chen, L., York, A., & Hastings, M. K.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Marquette University (US)
Corresponding author
Hastings, Mary K.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2022-06-30
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
52-58
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283730186
Cited by
10
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • national center for medical rehabilitation research (T32 HD07434)
  • Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center and NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA091842)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK107809, F32 DK123916)
  • Administration for Community Living, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (90ARHF0006)
  • Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Grant (UL1 TR000448)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
telemedicine, type 2 diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, older adults, technology requirements, internet access, device accessibility, HbA1c testing, chair stand test, wearable activity monitoring, balance, self-efficacy, depression, quality of life, COVID-19 pandemic
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases, Quality of Life, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review