Cited by 49Drug-Induced Ocular ToxicityDiabetes Treatment and ManagementPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Real-world evidence assessment of the risk of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in patients prescribed semaglutide.

Open access
Klonoff, David C., Hui, Gavin, Gombar, Saurabh·2024·Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/19322968241268050

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent single-center study demonstrated a 4.28-fold (95% CI, 1.62-11.29) increased risk of NAION with semaglutide relative to non-GLP-1RAs.

    “A recent single-center study demonstrated a 4.28-fold (95% CI, 1.62-11.29) increased risk of NAION with semaglutide, a glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), relative to non–GLP-1RAs.”

    From Semaglutide and Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (2025) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Letter to the Editor describes Hathaway’s study as single-site and says it reported an association between semaglutide and NAION. It does not give the claimed 4.28-fold estimate or its confidence interval. The letter’s own matched analyses found no significant increase in NAION risk, so those numbers cannot be attributed to its results. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two prior studies have investigated NAION and semaglutide and have found contradictory findings.

    “Two prior studies4,5 have investigated NAION and semaglutide and have found contradictory findings.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Klonoff, D. C., Hui, G., & Gombar, S.
Affiliations
  • San Mateo Medical Center (US)
  • Atropos Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Klonoff, David C.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Published
2024-07-30
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
1517-1518
ISSN
1932-2968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401191418
Cited by
49
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 1
FWCI
19.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, semaglutide, drug safety, real-world evidence, type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review