Cited by 28Turtle Biology and ConservationFish Ecology and Management StudiesEnvironmental Conservation and Management

Impacts of Dams on Freshwater Turtles: A Global Review to Identify Conservation Solutions

Open access
Bárcenas-García, Andrea, Michalski, Fernanda, Morgan, William H., Smith, Rebecca K., Sutherland, William J., Gibbs, James P., Norris, Darren·2022·Tropical Conservation Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background and Research Aims: Dams impact freshwater ecosystems and biodiversity. Freshwater turtles are at direct and indirect risk due to changes caused by damming including the loss of terrestrial and aquatic nesting habitats, changes to food availability, and blocking movement. Effective management of these impacts requires robust evidence in order to gain an understanding of conservation solutions that work. Methods: We reviewed the global scientific literature that evaluated the impact of dams on freshwater turtles, and carried out additional searches of literature published in seventeen languages for studies evaluating actions to mitigate dam impacts. Results: The search produced 47 published articles documenting dam impacts on 30 freshwater turtle species from seven families (Chelidae, Chelydridae, Emydidae, Geoemydidae, Kinosternidae, Podocnemididae, and Trionychidae) in 13 countries. Few studies were found from Europe and Asia and none from Africa. Most studies were from temperate latitudes, where studies focused more on adults and less threatened species compared with tropical latitudes. More than half of the studies (57%, n = 27) suggested actions to help mitigate dam impacts. Yet, only five studies (three temperate and two tropical) documented the effect of interventions (dam removal, flow management, artificial pond maintenance and community-based action). Conclusion: These findings demonstrate a serious lack of documented evidence evaluating mitigation actions for dam impacts on freshwater turtles. Implications for Conservation: This lack of evidence reinforces the importance of strengthening and maintaining robust long-term studies needed to develop effective and adaptive conservation actions for this group of threatened vertebrates particularly in tropical regions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/19400829221103709

Cites

180 of 180 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

59 of the 239 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bárcenas-García, A., Michalski, F., Morgan, W. H., Smith, R. K., Sutherland, W. J., Gibbs, J. P., & Norris, D.
Affiliations
  • Postgraduate Programme in Tropical Biodiversity, Federal University of Amapá, Macapá, Brazil
  • Universidade Federal do Amapá (BR)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Norris, Darren
Venue
Tropical Conservation Science
Published
2022-05-23
Volume
15
ISSN
1940-0829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285264065
Cited by
28
References
239
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tropical Conservation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Arcadia Fund
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
  • The David and Claudia Harding Foundation
  • MAVA Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Turtle Biology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Conservation and Management
Keywords
dams, freshwater turtles, dam impacts, turtle conservation, habitat fragmentation, flow management, dam removal, artificial ponds, community-based conservation, threatened species, tropical freshwater ecosystems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review