PreprintCited by 18Turtle Biology and ConservationFish Ecology and Management StudiesHydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact

Amazonian run-of-river dam reservoir impacts underestimated: Evidence from a Before-After Control-Impact study of freshwater turtle nesting areas

Open access
Bárcenas-García, Andrea, Michalski, Fernanda, Gibbs, James P., Norris, Darren·2021·Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems

Preprint — published as 10.1002/aqc.3775 · Paper page

Abstract

Construction of hydropower dams is associated with negative impacts on biodiversity, yet there remains a lack of robust scientific evidence documenting the magnitude of these impacts particularly across highly biodiverse tropical waterways. Hydropower expansion is an increasing threat to the Endangered yellow-spotted river turtle ( Podocnemis unifilis ) across its tropical South American range. Yellow-spotted river turtle nesting areas were monitored as an indicator of dry season river level changes following run-of-river dam reservoir filling. A Before-After-Control-Impact (BACI) study design was used with multi-year field campaigns monitoring turtle nesting areas upstream of the dam. The cause and extent of changes in nesting areas were established using Generalized Additive Models. Nesting area density was evaluated in relation to: time (before versus after), treatment (control versus impact), time treatment interaction (BACI), distance to the dam and precipitation. The extent of changes was examined by comparing the proportion of nesting areas remaining during four years after reservoir filling. Dam construction generated an immediate and apparently permanent dry season river level rise that extended more than 20 km beyond impact assessment limits. On average the density of nesting areas declined 69% (from 0.48 to 0.15 per km) across 33 km of river directly impacted by the dam. This loss was reflected in a significant BACI interaction. Nesting area density was not explained by seasonal precipitation. Standardized monitoring of freshwater turtle nesting areas provided an effective means to quantify impacts of hydropower developments across biodiverse yet rapidly changing waterways. The negative impacts documented in this study should be preventable by mitigation actions including habitat creation and dry season flow regulation. Such measures would also likely benefit multiple species elsewhere in tropical rivers increasingly impacted by run-of-river dams.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.07.29.454366

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

24 of the 115 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bárcenas-García, A., Michalski, F., Gibbs, J. P., & Norris, D.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Pró-Carnívoros (BR)
  • State University of New York (US)
  • Universidade Federal do Amapá (BR)
Corresponding author
Norris, Darren
Venue
Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-07-30
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
508-522
ISSN
1052-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210847670
Cited by
18
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nd
Locations
  • Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development (AIDOAAA1100012)
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (88882.429990/2019‐01, 2019‐01, 88882, 2018-0)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (302806/2018-0, 2018-0, 403679/2016‐8, 2016‐8)
  • Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Turtle Biology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Hydropower, Displacement, Environmental Impact
Keywords
hydroelectric dams, run-of-river dams, reservoir impacts, freshwater turtles, Podocnemis unifilis, Amazonian rivers, habitat loss, flow regulation, habitat mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review