Cited by 145Populism, Right-Wing MovementsMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationMedia Studies and Communication

The Effects of Right-Wing Populist Communication on Emotions and Cognitions toward Immigrants

Wirz, Dominique S., Wettstein, Martin, Schulz, Anne, Müller, Philipp, Schemer, Christian, Ernst, Nicole, Esser, Frank, Wirth, Werner·2018·The International Journal of Press/Politics

Abstract

The persuasiveness of right-wing populist communication has become a widely discussed topic; it is often assumed that such messages might foster anti-immigrant attitudes among citizens. The present study explores the effects of the different components of right-wing populist communication—anti-immigrant messages, populist content, and populist style—on attitudes toward immigrants. By combining a media content analysis ( N = 605 articles) with a panel survey ( N = 1,968) in metropolitan areas of four Western European countries (France, Germany, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom), this study analyzes how citizens’ attitudes toward immigrants are influenced by the right-wing populist communication with which they are confronted in their individual media diet. The results show that anti-immigrant statements in the media lead to more negative cognitions toward immigrants, while populist content leads to more negative emotions. The study, thus, demonstrates that not only anti-immigrant rhetoric but also populism as a thin-centered ideology influence citizens’ attitudes toward immigrants on top of pre-existing attitudes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1940161218788956

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ideological climate, including political narratives, media reporting on immigration issues, and a nation's policies and practices surrounding immigration, may influence prejudice toward immigrants.

    “Ideological climate, including political narratives and media reporting on immigration issues, and a nation's policies and practices surrounding immigration may all influence prejudice toward immigrants (Messing & Ságvári 2019, Schemer 2012, Wirz et al. 2018).”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Wirz et al. 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wirz, D. S., Wettstein, M., Schulz, A., Müller, P., Schemer, C., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Wirth, W.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Wirz, Dominique S.
Venue
The International Journal of Press/Politics
Published
2018-08-02
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
496-516
ISSN
  • 1040-1620 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1612
  • 1940-1620
OpenAlex
W2887875208
Cited by
145
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1
FWCI
64.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Press/Politics (publishedVersion)
  • MADOC (University of Mannheim) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
Keywords
right-wing populism, populist communication, anti-immigrant sentiment, attitudes toward immigrants, emotions, cognition, media exposure, populist rhetoric, media diet, Western Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review