Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 31Shoulder Injury and TreatmentMuscle activation and electromyography studiesSports Performance and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Electromyographic Evaluation of Subdividing Active-Assistive Shoulder Elevation Exercises

Open access
Gaunt, Bryce W., McCluskey, George M., Uhl, Tim L.·2010·Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach

Abstract

Background: Active-assistive range of motion exercises to gain shoulder elevation have been subdivided into gravity-minimized and upright-assisted exercises, yet no study has evaluated differences in muscular demands. Hypothesis: Compared with gravity-minimized exercises, upright-assisted exercises will generate larger electromyographic (EMG) activity. Compared with all active-assistive exercises, upright active forward elevation will generate more EMG activity. Study design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Fifteen healthy individuals participated in this study. The supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and anterior deltoid were evaluated. The independent variables were 11 exercises performed in random order. The dependent variable was the maximum EMG amplitude of each muscle that was normalized to a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC). Results: Each muscle demonstrated significant differences between exercises ( P < .001), with upright active forward elevation producing the greatest EMG for all muscles (95% confidence interval [CI], 12% to 50% MVIC). The orders of exercise varied by muscle, but the 5 gravity-minimized exercises always generated the lowest EMG activity. The upright-assisted exercises (95% CI, 23% to 42% MVIC) for the anterior deltoid generated more EMG activity than did the gravity-minimized exercises (95% CI, 9% to 21% MVIC) ( P < .05). The infraspinatus and supraspinatus demonstrated increasing trends in EMG activity from gravity minimized to upright assisted ( P > .05). Conclusion: The results suggest a clear distinction between gravity-minimized exercises and upright-assisted exercises for the anterior deltoid but not for the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. Between the 2 types of assisted exercises, the results also suggest a clear distinction in terms of active elevation of the arm for the supraspinatus and anterior deltoid but not for the infraspinatus. Clinical Relevance: Muscle activation levels increase as support is removed, but subdivision of active-assistive range of motion to protect the supraspinatus and infraspinatus may not be necessary.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1941738110366840

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bamman MM, 1997, J Strength Cond Res, 11, 68
  2. Basmajian JV, 1985, Muscle Alive, Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography, 5, 19
  3. Bigland-Ritchie B, 1981, Ciba Found Symp, 82, 130
  4. Blackburn TA, 1990, J Ath Train, 25, 40
  5. Komi PV, 1970, Electromyography, 10, 357
  6. Matsen FA, 1998, The Shoulder, 840
  7. Shultz SJ, 1999, J Athl Train, 34, 165

Cited by

See all 31

Metadata

Authors
Gaunt, B. W., McCluskey, G. M., & Uhl, T. L.
Affiliations
  • St Francis Rehabilitation Center, Columbus, Georgia
  • St Francis Orthopaedic Institute, Columbus, Georgia
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Gaunt, Bryce W.
Venue
Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach
Published
2010-09
Volume
2
Issue
5
Pages
424-432
ISSN
  • 1941-0921 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-7381
OpenAlex
W1865318306
Cited by
31
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
shoulder elevation, muscle activation, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, anterior deltoid, range of motion exercises, shoulder rehabilitation, electromyography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.