The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Overcoming Correlational Pitfalls: Experimental Evidence Suggests That Evaluative Conditioning Occurs for Explicit But Not Implicit Encoding of CS–US Pairings
Abstract
Do people need to explicitly encode conditioned stimuli–unconditioned stimuli (CS–US) pairings for evaluative conditioning (EC) effects to emerge? Despite the large number of studies that addressed this issue, no simple answer has emerged yet. In part, this is due to the relative lack of experimental evidence for the role of awareness of the CS–US contingency at encoding in EC. In the present experiment, participants’ encoding of the CS–US pairings was experimentally manipulated by relying on foveal and parafoveal presentations of the CSs. More specifically, spatial locations (i.e., foveal vs. parafoveal) of the CSs and US valence (i.e., positive vs. negative) were manipulated within participants, and CS–US pairings were counterbalanced across participants. Results reveal explicit encoding of the CSs and EC effects for the foveal CS presentations only. We discuss the implications of these experimental findings for the associative and propositional approach to EC.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dedonder et al. (2014) found an EC effect only for foveal but not for parafoveal CSs.
“An EC effect was found only for foveal but not for parafoveal CSs, the latter of which were less likely to enter awareness.”
From Unawareness of Attitudes, Their Environmental Causes, and Their Behavioral Effects (2025) · cites this paper as Dedonder et al. 2014
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 45
- 10.1177/0956797610384152 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699939008406760 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lmot.2012.06.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lmot.2012.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.464 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.020 · DOI
- 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.755 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.06.004 · DOI
- 10.3758/LB.37.1.1 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.345 · DOI
- 10.1068/p5206 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699931.2010.513497 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699930441000292 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699931.2011.588687 · DOI
- 10.1006/ccog.2001.0525 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jcps.2010.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.lmot.2012.06.004 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699931003696380 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.01.002 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0018916 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0026477 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0014747 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43005-1 · DOI
- 10.1037/0096-1523.17.1.125 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699931.2011.565036 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.09.049 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167292182006 · DOI
- 10.1080/02724990444000140 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699930441000319 · DOI
- 10.1037/0097-7403.28.1.3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-1031(90)90053-O · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9280.00376 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.130 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0013429 · DOI
- Rescorla R. A., 1972, Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory, 64
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01811.x · DOI
- Schwartz B., 1989, Psychology of learning and behavior
- 10.1016/j.jml.2009.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0013255 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0016196 · DOI
- 10.1086/653656 · DOI
- 10.1080/02699930500304654 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.919 · DOI
- 10.3758/BF03206429 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Unawareness of Attitudes, Their Environmental Causes, and Their Behavioral Effects
Gawronski, B., & Corneille, O. (2025) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-051324-031037 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dedonder, J., Corneille, O., Bertinchamps, D., & Yzerbyt, V.
- Affiliations
- UCLouvain (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Dedonder, Jonathan
- Venue
- Social Psychological and Personality Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-06-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 250-257
- ISSN
- 1948-5506 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-5514
- OpenAlex
- W2169543946
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Psychological and Personality Science (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- evaluative conditioning, CS-US pairing, spatial location, implicit learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review