The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An empirical model for predicting energy consumption of manufacturing processes: a case of turning process
Abstract
Optimizing the energy efficiency of processes has become a priority in the manufacturing sector; driven by soaring energy costs and the environmental impact caused by high energy consumption levels. The energy consumed by a machine tool performing a turning process consists of not only the energy required by the tool tip for material removal but also the energy used for auxiliary functions. Traditionally, the energy required for the cutting process is estimated based on cutting force prediction equations. However, this estimation is limited to the energy consumption of the tool tip. Thus, the aim of this paper is to develop a reliable method to predict the total energy consumption of a selected machine tool performing a turning operation. In order to compare the energy consumption under different cutting conditions, the specific energy consumption is defined as a functional unit: the energy consumed to remove 1 cm 3 of material. An empirical model is obtained based on power measurements under various cutting conditions, and it is able to provide a reliable prediction of energy consumption for given process parameters. Additional investigations are conducted in order to understand and explain each coefficient in the energy consumption model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Energy consumption model and energy efficiency of machine tools: a comprehensive literature review
Zhou, L., Li, J., Li, F., Meng, Q., Li, J., & Xu, X. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.093 · Cited by 498
Yoon, H.-S., Lee, J.-Y., Kim, H.-S., Kim, M.-S., Kim, E.-S., Shin, Y.-J., Chu, W.-S., & Ahn, S.-H. (2014) · International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology · doi:10.1007/s40684-014-0033-0 · Cited by 324
Modelling of direct energy requirements in mechanical machining processes
Balogun, V. A., & Mativenga, P. T. (2013) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.015 · Cited by 324
Leveraging the Capabilities of Industry 4.0 for Improving Energy Efficiency in Smart Factories
Mohamed, N., Al-Jaroodi, J., & Lazarova-Molnar, S. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2897045 · Cited by 168
Tool Wear Progression and its Effect on Energy Consumption in Turning of Titanium Alloy (Ti-6Al-4V)
Younas, M., Jaffery, S. H. I., Khan, M., Ahmad, R., Ali, L., Khan, Z., & Khan, A. (2019) · Mechanical Sciences · doi:10.5194/ms-10-373-2019 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, W., & Kara, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-08-22
- Volume
- 225
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1636-1646
- ISSN
- 0954-4054 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-2975
- OpenAlex
- W2120096609
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An empirical model for predicting energy consumption of manufacturing processes: a case of turning process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/2041297511398541
- The paper
- Li, W., & Kara, S. (2011). An empirical model for predicting energy consumption of manufacturing processes: a case of turning process. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041297511398541
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.