Cited by 76Embodied and Extended CognitionVisual perception and processing mechanismsPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Information Is Where You Find It: Perception as an Ecologically Well-Posed Problem

Open access
Warren, William H.·2021·i-Perception

Abstract

Texts on visual perception typically begin with the following premise: Vision is an ill-posed problem, and perception is underdetermined by the available information. If this were really the case, however, it is hard to see how vision could ever get off the ground. James Gibson’s signal contribution was his hypothesis that for every perceivable property of the environment, however subtle, there must be a higher order variable of information, however complex, that specifies it—if only we are clever enough to find them. Such variables are informative about behaviorally relevant properties within the physical and ecological constraints of a species’ niche. Sensory ecology is replete with instructive examples, including weakly electric fish, the narwal’s tusk, and insect flight control. In particular, I elaborate the case of passing through gaps. Optic flow is sufficient to control locomotion around obstacles and through openings. The affordances of the environment, such as gap passability, are specified by action-scaled information. Logically ill-posed problems may thus, on closer inspection, be ecologically well-posed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20416695211000366

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perception is not a problem of interpretation under uncertainty but a continuous process of attunement to ecological information.

    “Perception, then, is not a problem of interpretation under uncertainty but a continuous process of attunement to ecological information.”

    From The myth of the Bayesian brain (2025) · cites this paper as Warren 2021

  • Perception is fundamentally action-oriented, relational, and environment-coupled, grounded in real-time interaction rather than mediated by internal representations or probabilistic inference.

    “It is fundamentally action-oriented, relational, and environment-coupled, grounded in real-time interaction rather than mediated by internal representations or probabilistic inference (Michaels and Carello 1981; Warren 2021).”

    From The myth of the Bayesian brain (2025) · cites this paper as Warren 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 88

  1. Altshuler D. L. Srinivasan M. V. (2018). Comparison of visually guided flight in insects and birds. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 157. 29615852 PMC5864886
  2. Beall A. C. Loomis J. M. (1996). Visual control of steering without course information. Perception, 25, 481– 494. 8817623
  3. Ben-Nun A. Guershon M. Ayali A. (2013). Self body-size perception in an insect. Naturwissenschaften, 100(5), 479– 484. 23612986
  4. Bruggeman H. Zosh W. Warren W. H. (2007). Optic flow drives human visuo-locomotor adaptation. Current Biology, 17, 2035– 2040. 18023350 PMC2228332
  5. Buckingham E. (1914). On physically similar systems: Illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Physical Review, 4, 345– 376.
  6. Budelli R. Caputi A. A. (2000). The electric image in weakly electric fish: Perception of objects of complex impedance. Journal of Experimental Biology, 203(3), 481– 492. 10637177
  7. Duchon A. P. Warren W. H. (1994). Robot navigation from a Gibsonian viewpoint. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, San Antonio, TX (pp. 2272–2277).
  8. Duchon A. P. Warren W. H. (2002). A visual equalization strategy for locomotor control: Of honeybees, robots, and humans. Psychological Science, 13, 272– 278. 12009050
  9. Dusenbery D. B. (1996). Information is where you find it. The Biological Bulletin, 191(1), 124– 128. 29220218
  10. Fath A. J. Fajen B. R. (2011). Static and dynamic visual information about the size and passability of an aperture. Perception, 40(8), 887– 904. 22132505 PMC3420977
  11. Feldman J. (2013). Tuning your priors to the world. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(1), 13– 34. 23335572 PMC3776441
  12. Firestone C. (2013). How “paternalistic” is spatial perception? Why wearing a heavy backpack doesn’t—And couldn’t—Make hills look steeper. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(4), 455– 473. 26173123
  13. Franchak J. M. (2017). Exploratory behaviors and recalibration: What processes are shared between functionally similar affordances? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(6), 1816– 1829. 28547681
  14. Franchak J. M. van der Zalm D. J. Adolph K. E. (2010). Learning by doing: Action performance facilitates affordance perception. Vision Research, 50(24), 2758– 2765. 20858512 PMC3013505
  15. Gibson J. J. (1958). Visually controlled locomotion and visual orientation in animals. British Journal of Psychology, 49, 182– 194. 13572790
  16. Gibson J. J. (1959). Perception as a function of stimulation. In Koch S. (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. I, pp. 456– 473). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  17. Gibson J. J. Olum P. Rosenblatt F. (1955). Parallax and perspective during aircraft landings. American Journal of Psychology, 68, 372– 385. 13248971
  18. Grandfield K. Chattah N. L.-T. Djomehri S. Eidelmann N. Eichmiller F. C. Webb S.,... Ho S. P. (2014). The narwhal (Monodon monoceros) cementum–dentin junction: A functionally graded biointerphase. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 228(8), 754– 767. 25205746
  19. Harris J. M. Bonas W. (2002). Optic flow and scene structure do not always contribute to the control of human walking. Vision Research, 42, 1619– 1626. 12079790
  20. Harris M. G. Carre G. (2001). Is optic flow used to guide walking while wearing a displacing prism? Perception, 30, 811– 818. 11515954
  21. Heide-Jørgensen M. P. Dietz R. (1995). Some characteristics of narwhal, Monodon monoceros, diving behaviour in Baffin Bay. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 73(11), 2120– 2132.
  22. Jacobs D. M. Michaels C. F. (2007). Direct learning. Ecological Psychology, 19(4), 321– 349.
  23. Kirchner W. Srinivasan M. (1989). Freely flying honeybees use image motion to estimate object distance. Naturwissenschaften, 76(6), 281– 282.
  24. Knill D. C. Kersten D. Yuille A. (1996). A Bayesian formulation of visual perception. In Knill D. C. Richards W. (Eds.), Perception as Bayesian inference (pp. 1– 21). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  25. Langewiesche W. (1944). Stick and rudder. McGraw-Hill.
  26. Lappin J. S. (2016). Identifying spatiotemporal information. In Houpt J. W. Blaha L. M. (Eds.), Mathematical models of perception and cognition, v. 1 (pp. 121– 165). Psychology Press.
  27. Lee D. N. (1980). Visuo-motor coordination in space-time. In Stelmach G. E. Requin J. (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 281– 295). North-Holland.
  28. Lewicki M. S. Olshausen B. A. Surlykke A. Moss C. F. (2014). Scene analysis in the natural environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(199), 1– 21. 24744740 PMC3978336
  29. Li L. Niehorster D. C. (2014). Influence of optic flow on the control of heading and target egocentric direction during steering toward a goal. Journal of Neurophysiology, 112(4), 766– 777. 25128559
  30. Li L. Sweet B. T. Stone L. S. (2006). Humans can perceive heading without visual path information. Journal of Vision, 6(9), 2– 2. 17083281
  31. Llewellyn K. R. (1971). Visual guidance of locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 91, 224– 230. 5134668
  32. Longuet-Higgins H. C. Prazdny K. (1980). The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 208, 385– 397. 6106198
  33. Mark L. S. (1987). Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: A study of sitting and stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 360– 370. 2958585
  34. Mark L. S. Balliett J. A. Craver K. D. Douglas S. D. Fox T. (1990). What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. Ecological Psychology, 2(4), 325– 366.
  35. Mollon, J. D. (1997). “… On the basis of velocity cues alone”: Some perceptual themes, 1946–1996. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A(4), 859–878. 9450381
  36. Nakayama K. Loomis J. M. (1974). Optical velocity patterns, velocity sensitive neurons, and space perception: A hypothesis. Perception, 3, 63– 80. 4444922
  37. Nakayama K. Shimojo S. (1992). Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. Science, 257(5075), 1357– 1363. 1529336
  38. Nityananda V. Tarawneh G. Rosner R. Nicolas J. Crichton S. Read J. (2016). Insect stereopsis demonstrated using a 3D insect cinema. Scientific Reports, 6, 18718. 26740144 PMC4703989
  39. Nweeia M. T. Eichmiller F. C. Hauschka P. V. Donahue G. A. Orr J. R. Ferguson S. H., … Dietz R. (2014). Sensory ability in the narwhal tooth organ system. The Anatomical Record, 297(4), 599– 617. 24639076
  40. Nweeia M. T. Eichmiller F. C. Nutarak C. Eidelman N. Giuseppetti A. A. Quinn J., … Angnatsiak D. (2009). Considerations of anatomy, morphology, evolution, and function for narwhal dentition. In Krupnik I. Lang M. A. Miller S. E. (Eds.), Smithsonian at the poles: Contributions to International Polar Year science (pp. 223– 240). Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.
  41. Orlandi N. (2013). Embedded seeing: Vision in the natural world. Nous, 47(4), 727– 747.
  42. Orlandi N. (2016). Bayesian perception is ecological perception. Philosophical Topics, 44(2), 327– 352.
  43. Palmer S. E. (1999). Vision science. MIT Press.
  44. Pan J. S. Coats R. O. Bingham G. P. (2014). Calibration is action specific but perturbation of perceptual units is not. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(1), 404– 415. 23937217
  45. Pepping G. J. Grealy M. L. (Eds.). (2007). Closing the gap: The scientific writings of David N. Lee. Erlbaum.
  46. Preuss T. Hengstenberg R. (1992). Structure and kinematics of the prosternal organs and their influence on head position in the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala Meig. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 171(4), 483– 493.
  47. Ravi S. Bertrand O. Siesenop T. Manz L.-S. Doussot C. Fisher A. Egelhaaf M. (2019). Gap perception in bumblebees. Journal of Experimental Biology, 222(2), 1–10. 30683732
  48. Ravi S. Siesenop T. Bertrand O. Li L. Doussot C. Warren W. H., Combes, S. A., & Egelhaaf M. (2020a). Bumblebees perceive the spatial layout of their environment in relation to their body size and form to minimize inflight collisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(49), 31494–31499. PMC7733852 33229535
  49. Ravi S. Siesenop T. Bertrand O. Li L. Doussot C. Warren W. H., Combes, S. A., & Egelhaaf M. (2020b). Supporting information. https://www.pnas.org/content/suppl/2020/11/19/2016872117.DCSupplemental PMC7733852 33229535
  50. Rogers B. J. (2021). Optic flow: Perceiving and acting in a 3-D world. i-Perception, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669520987257 PMC7869175 33613957 · DOI
  51. Runeson S. (1988). The distorted room illusion, equivalent configurations, and the specificity of static optic arrays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(2), 295. 2967881
  52. Rushton S. K. Harris J. M. Lloyd M. Wann J. P. (1998). Guidance of locomotion on foot uses perceived target location rather than optic flow. Current Biology, 8, 1191– 1194. 9799736
  53. Saunders J. A. (2014). Reliability and relative weighting of visual and nonvisual information for perceiving direction of self-motion during walking. Journal of Vision, 14(3), 24– 24. PMC3969026 24648194
  54. Saunders J. A. Durgin F. H. (2011). Adaptation to conflicting visual and physical heading directions during walking. Journal of Vision, 11(3: 15), 1– 10. 21427210
  55. Schiffner I. Vo H. D. Bhagavatula P. S. Srinivasan M. V. (2014). Minding the gap: In-flight body awareness in birds. Frontiers in Zoology, 11(1), 64.
  56. Schuring D. J. (1977). Scale models in engineering. Pergamon Press.
  57. Schwarz, S., & von der Emde, G. (2001). Distance discrimination during active electrolocation in the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 186, 1185–1197. 11288829
  58. Sedgwick H. A. (1986). Space perception. In Boff K. R. Kaufman L. Thomas J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance, vol 1: Sensory processes and perception (Vol. i, pp. 21.21– 21.57). Wiley.
  59. Sedgwick, H. A. (2021). J. J. Gibson's ground theory of space perception. Advance online publication. PMC8334293 34377427
  60. Serres J. R. Masson G. P. Ruffier F. Franceschini N. (2008). A bee in the corridor: Centering and wall-following. Naturwissenschaften, 95(12), 1181. 18813898
  61. Serres J. R. Ruffier F. (2017). Optic flow-based collision-free strategies: From insects to robots. Arthropod Structure & Development, 46(5), 703– 717. 28655645
  62. Snapp-Childs W. Bingham G. P. (2009). The affordance of barrier crossing in young children exhibits dynamic, not geometric, similarity. Experimental Brain Research, 198(4), 527– 533. 19626315
  63. Srinivasan M. V. (1998). Insects as Gibsonian animals. Ecological Psychology, 10(3-4), 251–270.
  64. Srinivasan M. V. Lehrer M. Kirchner W. Zhang S. W. (1991). Range perception through apparent image speed in freely-flying honeybees. Visual Neuroscience, 6, 519– 535. 2069903
  65. Stoper A. E. Cohen M. M. (1986). Judgments of eye level in light and in darkness. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(5), 311– 316. 3786100
  66. Stoper A. E. Cohen M. M. (1989). Effect of structured visual environments on apparent eye level. Perception & Psychophysics, 46(5), 469– 475. 2813032
  67. Turano K. A. Yu D. Hao L. Hicks J. C. (2005). Optic-flow and egocentric-direction strategies in walking: Central vs. perhipheral visual field. Vision Research, 45, 3117– 3132. 16084556
  68. van Andel S. Cole M. H. Pepping G.-J. (2017). A systematic review on perceptual-motor calibration to changes in action capabilities. Human Movement Science, 51, 59– 71. 27870980
  69. von der Emde G. (1990). Discrimination of objects through electrolocation in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 167(3), 413– 421. 11288829
  70. von der Emde G. (1999). Active electrolocation of objects in weakly electric fish. Journal of Experimental Biology, 202(10), 1205– 1215. 10210662
  71. von der Emde G. (2004). Distance and shape: Perception of the 3-dimensional world by weakly electric fish. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 98(1-3), 67– 80. 15477023
  72. von der Emde G. (2006). Non-visual environmental imaging and object detection through active electrolocation in weakly electric fish. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 192(6), 601– 612. 16645886
  73. von der Emde G. Behr K. Bouton B. Engelmann J. Fetz S. Folde C. (2010). 3-Dimensional scene perception during active electrolocation in a weakly electric pulse fish. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 26. 20577635 PMC2889722
  74. von der Emde G. Bleckmann H. (1997). Waveform tuning of electroreceptor cells in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 181(5), 511– 524.
  75. von der Emde G. Fetz S. (2007). Distance, shape and more: Recognition of object features during active electrolocation in a weakly electric fish. Journal of Experimental Biology, 210(17), 3082– 3095. 17704083
  76. von der Emde G. Ronacher B. (1994). Perception of electric properties of objects in electrolocating weakly electric fish: Two-dimensional similarity scaling reveals a City-Block metric. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 175(6), 801– 812.
  77. von der Emde G. Schwarz S. Gomez L. Budelli R. Grant K. (1998). Electric fish measure distance in the dark. Nature, 395(6705), 890– 894. 9804420
  78. Warren W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordances: Visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 683– 703. 6238127
  79. Warren W. H. (2007). Action-scaled information. In Pepping G. J. Grealy M. L. (Eds.), Closing the gap: The scientific writings of David N. Lee (pp. 253– 268). Erlbaum.
  80. Warren W. H. (2008). Optic flow. In A. I. Basbaum, A. Kaneko, G. M. Shepherd, & G. Westheimer (Eds.), The senses—A comprehensive reference: Vision II (Vol. 2, T.D. Albright & R. Masland, Eds., pp. 219–230). Academic Press.
  81. Warren W. H. (2012). Does this computational theory solve the right problem? Marr, Gibson, and the goal of vision. Perception, 41, 1053– 1060. 23409371 PMC3816718
  82. Warren W. H. Kay B. A. Zosh W. D. Duchon A. P. Sahuc S. (2001). Optic flow is used to control human walking. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 213– 216. 11175884
  83. Warren W. H. Whang S. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 371– 383. 2958586
  84. Wilmut K. Barnett A. L. (2011). Locomotor behaviour of children while navigating through apertures. Experimental Brain Research, 210(2), 185– 194. 21390486
  85. Withagen R. Chemero A. (2009). Naturalizing perception: Developing the Gibsonian approach to perception along evolutionary lines. Theory & Psychology, 19(3), 363– 389.
  86. Wood R. M. Harvey M. A. Young C. E. Beedie A. Wilson T. (2000). Weighting to go with the flow? Current Biology, 10, R545– R546. 10959834
  87. Wu J. He Z. J. Ooi T. L. (2005). Visually perceived eye level and horizontal midline of the body trunk influenced by optic flow. Perception, 34(9), 1045– 1060. 16245484
  88. Warren W. H. (2021). Information is where you find it: Perception as an ecologically well-posed problem. i-Perception, 12(2), 1–24. 10.1177/20416695211000366 PMC7995459 33815740

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warren, W. H.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Warren, William H.
Venue
i-Perception
Published
2021-03
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
20416695211000366-20416695211000366
ISSN
2041-6695 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3136749922
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 10
FWCI
7.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • i-Perception (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (BCS-1849446)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY029745)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
ecological perception, ill-posed problems, James Gibson, affordances, optical flow, weakly electric fish, insect flight control, sensory ecology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review