Cited by 23Treatment of Major DepressionStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsPharmaceutical industry and healthcare

Prophylactic effects or withdrawal reactions? An analysis of time-to-event data from antidepressant relapse prevention trials submitted to the FDA

Open access
Hengartner, Michael P., Plöderl, Martin·2021·Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Background: Relapse prevention trials build the scientific foundation for recommendation of antidepressant continuation and maintenance therapy. However, the validity of the evidence is disputed and may be biased due to withdrawal confounding. Methods: We analysed survival curves from all antidepressant relapse prevention trials submitted to the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 1987 and 2012 for 13 approved drugs. The main outcome was the percent of the drug effect (placebo-antidepressant difference in relapse events) at any week of the maintenance phase in relation to the total drug effect at the endpoint of the randomised maintenance phase. Results: Altogether, 14 studies with a mean observation period of 38.9 weeks (Kaplan–Meier estimators) were analysed. At week 3, a mean of 20.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.9–30.3%] of the total drug effect was achieved. At weeks 6 and 12, the corresponding figures were 50.3% (37.3–63.3%) and 69.0% (55.1–82.8%). No further antidepressant–placebo separation was observed as of week 24 [101.0% of total drug effect (94.6–107.3%)]. This means that censoring relapse events that occurred in the first 3, 6, 12 and 24 weeks would reduce the total drug effect at study endpoint by 20.6%, 50.3%, 69.0% and 101.0%, respectively. Assuming antidepressants had a constant prophylactic effect over 38.9 weeks, we further showed that, around week 6, the antidepressant–placebo separation was about three times larger than expected. Conclusion: The placebo–antidepressant separation was disproportionally large between weeks 3 and 6 of the randomised maintenance phase. The benefits of continuing antidepressants relative to abrupt/rapid discontinuation declined sharply after week 6. This indicates an excess of relapse events in the placebo arms during the early maintenance phase that may be due to withdrawal reactions caused by abrupt/rapid discontinuation of active treatment. If these early relapse events are due to a direct pharmacological effect, then antidepressants’ true prophylactic long-term effects are substantially overestimated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20451253211032051

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In both clinical research and practice, protracted and persistent withdrawal symptoms are frequently misdiagnosed as a relapse of the primary mental health condition (typically depression) or new emergent mental disorders.

    “Unfortunately, it appears that in both clinical research and practice, protracted and persistent withdrawal symptoms are frequently misdiagnosed as a relapse of the primary mental health condition (typically depression) or new emergent mental disorders (Cosci et al., 2024; Guy et al., 2020; Hengartner and Plöderl, 2021)”

    From Post-acute withdrawal syndrome (PAWS) after stopping antidepressants: a systematic review with meta-narrative synthesis (2025) · cites this paper as Hengartner and Plöderl, 2021

    The Introduction and Discussion say antidepressant withdrawal symptoms can resemble depression and may be counted as relapse in prevention trials. The Conclusion calls withdrawal confounding the most plausible explanation but notes that the analysis did not measure withdrawal symptoms. The paper does not establish that protracted or persistent symptoms are frequently misdiagnosed in clinical practice or as new mental disorders. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [2]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Depression in adults: recognition and management, nice.org.uk/guidance/cg90 (2009, accessed 17 October 2017). 31990491
  2. [3]Borges S Chen YF Laughren TP, et al. Review of maintenance trials for major depressive disorder: a 25-year perspective from the US Food and Drug Administration. J Clin Psychiatry 2014; 75: 205– 214. 24717376
  3. [6]El-Mallakh RS Briscoe B. Studies of long-term use of antidepressants: how should the data from them be interpreted? CNS Drugs 2012; 26: 97– 109. 22296314
  4. [7]Hengartner MP. How effective are antidepressants for depression over the long term? A critical review of relapse prevention trials and the issue of withdrawal confounding. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol 2020; 10: 2045125320921694. 32435449 PMC7225779
  5. [11]Michelson D Fava M Amsterdam J, et al. Interruption of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2000; 176: 363– 368. 10827885
  6. [12]Rosenbaum JF Fava M Hoog SL, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor discontinuation syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Biol Psychiatry 1998; 44: 77– 87. 9646889
  7. [13]Healy D. Treatment-induced stress syndromes. Med Hypotheses 2010; 74: 764– 768. 20171790
  8. [14]Andrews PW Kornstein SG Halberstadt LJ, et al. Blue again: perturbational effects of antidepressants suggest monoaminergic homeostasis in major depression. Front Psychol 2011; 2: 159. 21779273 PMC3133866
  9. [16]Greenhouse JB Stangl D Kupfer DJ, et al. Methodologic issues in maintenance therapy clinical trials. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991; 48: 313– 318. 1901203
  10. [17]Kaymaz N van Os J Loonen AJ, et al. Evidence that patients with single versus recurrent depressive episodes are differentially sensitive to treatment discontinuation: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. J Clin Psychiatry 2008; 69: 1423– 1436. 19193343
  11. [18]Viguera AC Baldessarini RJ Friedberg J. Discontinuing antidepressant treatment in major depression. Harv Rev Psychiatry 1998; 5: 293– 306. 9559348
  12. [20]Eaton WW Shao H Nestadt G, et al. Population-based study of first onset and chronicity in major depressive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008; 65: 513– 520. 18458203 PMC2761826
  13. [22]Ten Have M de Graaf R van Dorsselaer S, et al. Recurrence and chronicity of major depressive disorder and their risk indicators in a population cohort. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2018; 137: 503– 515. 29577236
  14. [23]Fava GA Gatti A Belaise C, et al. Withdrawal symptoms after selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor discontinuation: a systematic review. Psychother Psychosom 2015; 84: 72– 81. 25721705
  15. [24]Fava GA Benasi G Lucente M, et al. Withdrawal symptoms after serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor discontinuation: systematic review. Psychother Psychosom 2018; 87: 195– 203. 30016772
  16. [29]Cohen D Recalt A. Discontinuing psychotropic drugs from participants in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Psychother Psychosom 2019; 88: 96– 104. 30923288
  17. [31]Chouinard G Chouinard VA. New classification of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor withdrawal. Psychother Psychosom 2015; 84: 63– 71. 25721565
  18. [33]Ghaemi SN. Why antidepressants are not antidepressants: STEP-BD, STAR*D, and the return of neurotic depression. Bipolar Disord 2008; 10: 957– 968. 19594510
  19. [34]Hengartner MP. Methodological flaws, conflicts of interest, and scientific fallacies: implications for the evaluation of antidepressants’ efficacy and harm. Front Psychiatry 2017; 8: 275. 29270136 PMC5725408
  20. [36]de Vries YA Roest AM de Jonge P, et al. The cumulative effect of reporting and citation biases on the apparent efficacy of treatments: the case of depression. Psychol Med 2018; 48: 2453– 2455. 30070192 PMC6190062
  21. [37]Melander H Ahlqvist-Rastad J Meijer G, et al. Evidence b(i)ased medicine–selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications. BMJ 2003; 326: 1171– 1173. 12775615 PMC156459
  22. [38]Turner EH Matthews AM Linardatos E, et al. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 252– 260. 18199864
  23. [40]Haddad PM Anderson IM. Recognising and managing antidepressant discontinuation symptoms. Adv Psychiatr Treat 2007; 13: 447– 457.
  24. [41]Ghaemi SN Selker HP. Maintenance efficacy designs in psychiatry: randomized discontinuation trials - enriched but not better. J Clin Transl Sci 2017; 1: 198– 204. 29082033 PMC5647671

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hengartner, M. P., & Plöderl, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Paracelsus Medical University (AT)
Corresponding author
Hengartner, Michael P.
Venue
Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology
Published
2021-01
Volume
11
Pages
20451253211032051-20451253211032051
ISSN
  • 2045-1253 (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-1261
OpenAlex
W3191247672
Cited by
23
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Therapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • ZHAW Digital Collection (cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Keywords
maintenance therapy, preventive effect, survival analysis, survival curves, abrupt discontinuation, depression relapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review