Cited by 100Preterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy

Cardiovascular disease risk in women with a history of spontaneous preterm delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Heida, Karst Y, Velthuis, Birgitta K, Oudijk, Martijn A, Reitsma, Johannes B, Bots, Michiel L, Franx, Arie, van Dunné, Frederique M, on behalf of the Dutch Guideline Development Group on Cardiovascular Risk Management after Reproductive Disorders·2016·European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests a relation between having had spontaneous preterm delivery and cardiovascular disease in the future. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the relation between a history of spontaneous preterm delivery and risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD), stroke or overall cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS: We carried out a systematic search in Medline (from 1966 to 17 July 2014) and Embase (from 1980 to 17 July 2014). We included studies with a cohort design assessing the relation between spontaneous preterm delivery and fatal or nonfatal IHD, stroke, or overall CVD. IHD, stroke and CVD were assessed through linkage with national registries. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Of the 10 cohort studies included; sample sizes ranged from 3706 to 923,686 women and follow-up ranged from 12-35 years. Spontaneous preterm delivery was related to an increased risk of developing or dying from IHD (HR 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-1.57), stroke (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.53-1.91) and overall CVD (relative risk (HR) 2.01, 95% CI 1.52-2.65). All studies found a positive effect, although substantial between-study heterogeneity was found for IHD and CVD. CONCLUSION: Spontaneous preterm delivery is an independent risk factor for the development of IHD, stroke and overall CVD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2047487314566758

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bonamy AK, Parikh NI, Cnattingius S, et al. Birth char- acteristics and subsequent risks of maternal cardiovascu- lar disease: Effects of gestational age and fetal growth. Circulation 2011; 124: 2839-2846.
  2. Irgens HU, Reisaeter L, Irgens LM, et al. Long term mortal- ity of mothers and fathers after pre-eclampsia: Population based cohort study. Br Med J 2001; 323: 1213-1217.
  3. mothers/ or (maternal adj6 (cardiovascular or risk*)).ti,ab. 17. 13 and 16 22. (preterm and cardiovascular).ti. 23. 8 and 22 24. 17 or 23 (337) -322 unique Embase (Elsevier)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heida, K. Y., Velthuis, B. K., Oudijk, M. A., Reitsma, J. B., Bots, M. L., Franx, A., van Dunné, F. M., & on behalf of the Dutch Guideline Development Group on Cardiovascular Risk Management after Reproductive Disorders
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical Center Haaglanden, the Netherlands
Corresponding author
Heida, Karst Y
Venue
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Published
2015-02-09
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
253-263
ISSN
  • 2047-4873 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-4881
OpenAlex
W2120179733
Cited by
100
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Keywords
spontaneous preterm birth, cardiovascular risk, ischemic heart disease, stroke, women's health, long-term maternal outcomes, cardiovascular risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Chi-Square Distribution, Odds Ratio, Myocardial Ischemia, Risk Assessment, Stroke, Premature Birth, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review