The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychosocial factors associated with change in pain and disability outcomes in chronic low back pain patients treated by physiotherapist: A systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Background: Almost 80% of people have low back pain at least once in their life. Clinical guidelines emphasize the use of conservative physiotherapy and the importance of staying active. While the psychological factors predicting poor recovery following surgical intervention are understood, the psychosocial factors associated with poor outcomes following physiotherapy have yet to be identified. Methods: Electronic searches of PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EBSCO were conducted using terms relating to psychosocial factors, chronic low back pain, disability and physiotherapy. Papers examining the relationship between psychosocial factors and pain and disability outcomes following physiotherapy were included. Two reviewers selected, appraised and extracted studies independently. Results: In total, 10 observational studies were identified that suggested an association between fear of movement, depression, self-efficacy and catastrophizing in modifying pain and disability outcomes following physiotherapy. Discussion: Although limited by methodological shortcomings of included studies, and heterogeneity of physiotherapy interventions and measures of disability and psychosocial outcomes, the findings are consistent with other research in the context of back pain and physiotherapy, which suggest an association between psychosocial factors, including fear of movement, catastrophizing and self-efficacy and pain and disability outcomes in chronic low back pain patients treated by physiotherapist. However, a direct relationship cannot be concluded from this study. Conclusion: Findings suggest an association between psychosocial factors, including fear of movement, catastrophizing and self-efficacy and pain and disability outcomes in chronic low back pain patients treated by physiotherapist, which warrants further study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“which is consistently associated with a poor prognosis [60,94,95,96].”
From Digital Rehabilitation for Elbow Pain Musculoskeletal Conditions: A Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study (2022) · cites this paper as [94]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554
Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., Altman, D. G., Barbour, V., Macdonald, H., Johnston, M., et al. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687 · Cited by 10,548
Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art.
Vlaeyen, J. W. S., & Linton, S. J. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00242-0 · Cited by 4,931
Chapter 4 European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain
Airaksinen, O., Brox, J. I., Cedraschi, C., Hildebrandt, J., Klaber-Moffett, J., Kovacs, F., Mannion, A. F., Reis, S., Staal, J. B., Ursin, H., et al. (2006) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1 · Cited by 2,594
Pincus, T., Burton, A. K., Vogel, S., & Field, A. P. (2002) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200203010-00017 · Cited by 1,633
Koes, B. W., van Tulder, M. W., Lin, C. C., Macedo, L. G., McAuley, J. H., & Maher, C. G. (2010) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1502-y · Cited by 1,301
Diagnostic Evaluation of Low Back Pain with Emphasis on Imaging
Jarvik, J. G., & Deyo, R. A. (2002) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-137-7-200210010-00010 · Cited by 706
Wertli, M. M., Rasmussen-Barr, E., Held, U., Weiser, S., Bachmann, L. M., & Brunner, F. (2014) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.033 · Cited by 343
Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care
Foster, N. E., Thomas, E., Bishop, A., Dunn, K. M., & Main, C. J. (2009) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.11.002 · Cited by 325
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Physical Therapy Approaches in the Treatment of Low Back Pain
Shipton, E. A. (2018) · Pain and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40122-018-0105-x · Cited by 193
Wong, J. J., Tricco, A. C., Côté, P., Liang, C. Y., Lewis, J. A., Bouck, Z., & Rosella, L. C. (2021) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-021-07079-8 · Cited by 91
Baets, L. D., Matheve, T., Meeus, M., Struyf, F., & Timmermans, A. A. A. (2019) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215519831056 · Cited by 82
Alhowimel, A., Alotaibi, M., Alenazi, A. M., Alqahtani, B. A., Alshehri, M. A., Alamam, D., & Alodaibi, F. (2021) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s343494 · Cited by 68
Self-citationSajid, I. M., Parkunan, A., & Frost, K. (2021) · BMJ Open Quality · doi:10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001287 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Alhowimel, A., AlOtaibi, M., Radford, K., & Coulson, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Corresponding author
- Alhowimel, Ahmed
- Venue
- SAGE Open Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-01-01
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 2050312118757387-2050312118757387
- ISSN
- 2050-3121 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5808969
- OpenAlex
- W2793287328
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- SAGE Open Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- chronic low back pain, psychosocial factors, physiotherapy, pain outcomes, disability outcome, kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, self-efficacy, depression, conservative treatment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
