Cited by 344Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedical Practices and RehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

Fear-avoidance beliefs—a moderator of treatment efficacy in patients with low back pain: a systematic review

Wertli, Maria M., Rasmussen-Barr, Eva, Held, Ulrike, Weiser, Sherri, Bachmann, Lucas M., Brunner, Florian·2014·The Spine Journal

Abstract

Background context Psychological factors are believed to influence the development of chronic low back pain. To date, it is not known how fear-avoidance beliefs (FABs) influence the treatment efficacy in low back pain.Purpose To summarize the evidence examining the influence of FABs measured with the Fear-Avoidance Belief Questionnaire or the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia on treatment outcomes in patients with low back pain.Study design/setting This is a systematic review.Patient sample Patients with low back pain.Outcome measures Work-related outcomes and perceived measures including return to work, pain, and disability.Methods In January 2013, the following databases were searched: BIOSIS, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, OTSeeker, PeDRO, PsycInfo, PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. A hand search of the six most often retrieved journals and a bibliography search completed the search.Study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions research studies that included patients with low back pain who participated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating nonoperative treatment efficacy. Out of 646 records, 78 articles were assessed in full text and 17 RCTs were included. Study quality was high in five studies and moderate in 12 studies.Results In patients with low back pain of up to 6 months duration, high FABs were associated with more pain and/or disability (4 RCTs) and less return to work (3 RCTs) (GRADE high-quality evidence, 831 patients vs. 322 in nonpredictive studies). A decrease in FAB values during treatment was associated with less pain and disability at follow-up (GRADE moderate evidence, 2 RCTs with moderate quality, 242 patients). Interventions that addressed FABs were more effective than control groups based on biomedical concepts (GRADE moderate evidence, 1,051 vs. 227 patients in studies without moderating effects). In chronic patients with LBP, the findings were less consistent. Two studies found baseline FABs to be associated with more pain and disability and less return to work (339 patients), whereas 3 others (832 patients) found none (GRADE low evidence). Heterogeneity of the studies impeded a pooling of the results.Conclusions Evidence suggests that FABs are associated with poor treatment outcome in patients with LBP of less than 6 months, and thus early treatment, including interventions to reduce FABs, may avoid delayed recovery and chronicity. Patients with high FABs are more likely to improve when FABs are addressed in treatments than when these beliefs are ignored, and treatment strategies should be modified if FABs are present.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.033

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wertli, M. M., Rasmussen-Barr, E., Held, U., Weiser, S., Bachmann, L. M., & Brunner, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • New York University Langone Orthopedic Hospital (US)
  • Universitätsklinik Balgrist (CH)
Corresponding author
Wertli, Maria M.
Venue
The Spine Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
14
Issue
11
Pages
2658-2678
ISSN
1529-9430 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980544906
Cited by
343
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 6
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Spine Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Keywords
fear-avoidance beliefs, low back pain, kinesiophobia, treatment efficacy, return to work, disability, pain, chronic low back pain, conservative treatment, psychological factors, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, moderators of treatment outcome, psychological intervention, work-related outcomes, treatment response prediction, treatment discontinuation
MeSH terms
Adult, Culture, Fear, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Low Back Pain, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review