Cited by 26Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealthcare Policy and ManagementMedical Coding and Health Information

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A practical guide to episode groupers for cost-of-illness analysis in health services research.

Open access
Peterson, Cora, Grosse, Scott D, Dunn, Abe·2019·SAGE Open Medicine

Abstract

Despite the prominence of episode groupers for analysis and reimbursement in US payer settings, peer-reviewed articles using episode groupers for cost-of-illness analysis that informs public health research and decision-making are uncommon. This article provides a brief practical guide to episode-based cost analysis and offers some examples of episode grouper products. It is intended for an audience of health services researchers and managers in public health settings who perform or commission cost-of-illness studies with the US healthcare claims fee-for-service data but lack familiarity with episode groupers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2050312119840200

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. McKesson Health Solutions, 2017, White paper: journey to value
  2. Dunn A, 2014, Surv Curr Bus, 95, 1
  3. National Quality Forum, 2014, Evaluating episode groupers: a report from the National Quality Forum
  4. MaCurdy T, 2008, Evaluating the functionality of the symmetry ETG and Medstat MEG software in forming episodes of care
  5. OptumInsight, 2017, White paper: symmetry episode treatment groups
  6. OptumInsight, 2017, White paper: symmetry procedure episode groups
  7. IBM Watson Health, 2018, White paper: The medical episode grouper: applications and methodology
  8. Winkleman R, 2007, A comparative analysis of claims-based tools for health risk assessment

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Peterson, C., Grosse, S. D., & Dunn, A.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Bureau of Economic Analysis (US)
Corresponding author
Peterson, Cora
Venue
SAGE Open Medicine
Published
2019-01
Volume
7
Pages
2050312119840200-2050312119840200
ISSN
2050-3121 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2933349164
Cited by
26
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SAGE Open Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
health insurance claims data, fee-for-service reimbursement, public health decision-making, health services research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review