Cited by 4Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealth, Medicine and Society

Cooperation in the mental health treatment of patients with outpatient commitment

Open access
Løvsletten, Maria, Lossius Husum, Tonje, Haug, Elisabeth, Granerud, Arild·2020·SAGE Open Medicine

Abstract

Background: Patients with outpatient commitment have a decision on coercive treatment from the specialist health services even if they are in their own home and receive municipal health services. Objective: The aim of this study is to gain more knowledge about how the outpatient commitment system works in the municipal health service and specialist health services, and how they collaborate with patients and across service levels from the perspectives of healthcare professionals. Methods: This is a qualitative study collecting data through focus group interviews with health personnel from the municipal health service and specialist health services. Results: The results describe the health personnel’s experiences with follow-up and interactions with the patients with outpatient commitment decisions, and their experiences with collaboration between service levels. Conclusion: The study show that outpatient commitment makes a difference in the way patients with this decision are followed up. The legislative amendment with new requirements for consent competence was challenging. Collaboration between services levels was also challenging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2050312120926410

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The change in terminology from compliance to concordance was not accepted by many researchers and health professionals, leading to alternative terms such as cooperation.

    “Although this implied a new approach to the HCP-patient relationship regarding an agreement on the therapeutic regimen, the change in terminology was not accepted by many researchers and health professionals, leading to alternative terms, such as “cooperation” [30].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]Rugkåsa J Burns T. Community treatment orders: are they useful? Brit J Psyc Adv 2017; 23(4): 222– 230.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Løvsletten, M., Lossius Husum, T., Haug, E., & Granerud, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute for Health & Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Innlandet Hospital Trust (NO)
  • University of Inland Norway (NO)
Corresponding author
Løvsletten, Maria
Venue
SAGE Open Medicine
Published
2020-01
Volume
8
Pages
2050312120926410-2050312120926410
ISSN
2050-3121 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3030025017
Cited by
4
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SAGE Open Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences (345012-12)
  • Innlandet Hospital Trust (150600)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
outpatient commitment, interprofessional collaboration, municipal health services, specialist health services, patient follow-up, health professionals' experiences, mental health law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review