Cited by 29Antibiotic Use and ResistanceAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Evaluation of antibiotic prescribing patterns among inpatients using World Health Organization indicators: a cross-sectional study

Open access
Tadesse, Tesfaye Yimer, Molla, Mulugeta, Yimer, Yohannis Shumet, Tarekegn, Benyas Shishigie, Kefale, Belayneh·2022·SAGE Open Medicine

Abstract

Objective: Even though antibiotic resistance is one of the most serious threats to global public health, it is becoming more common due to inappropriate antibiotic prescribing patterns. Thus, the purpose of this study is to assess antibiotic prescribing patterns among inpatients at an Ethiopian comprehensive specialized hospital. Methods: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was used. During the study period, data were collected from the charts of admitted patients in selected wards of Debre Tabor comprehensive specialized hospital. The World Health Organization's developed questionnaire and conventional antibiotic prescribing indicators were used to assess rational drug usage, with an emphasis on antibiotic prescribing trends. The data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 statistical software. Results: For 861 patients admitted to medical and pediatric wards, a total of 1444 antibiotics were prescribed. Overall, 60.6% of inpatients were prescribed at least one antibiotic, with an average (mean ± SD) number of antibiotics prescribed per patient of 1.7 ± 1.6. During their hospital stay, patients were given antibiotics for an average (mean ± SD) of 6.4 ± 2.7 days. Furthermore, 83.3% of antibiotics were prescribed for therapeutic purposes, whereas 100% were provided for empiric purposes. Ceftriaxone was the most commonly administered antibiotic in the study settings (49.2%). During the study period, Debre Tabor comprehensive specialized hospital had access to 67.5% of key antibiotics. Conclusion: The antibiotic prescribing pattern in our study diverged from the World Health Organization-recommended guidelines. Furthermore, all antibiotics were given without a culture or sensitivity test in every case. Setting up an antibiotic stewardship program, introducing antibiotic use based on culture and sensitivity tests, and adopting institutional guidelines could all help to address this issue.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20503121221096608

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data were collected using a structured checklist that was pre-tested and developed based on the WHO data abstraction form and WHO AWaRe 2023 classification.

    “Data were collected from the prescriptions of the outpatients, using a structured checklist that was pre-tested and developed based on the WHO data abstraction form for selected drug use indicators, and WHO AWaRe 2023 antibiotics classification framework7,8.”

    From Antibiotic-prescribing patterns in outpatient departments from a tertiary care hospital in Manipur using WHO AWaRe classification (2025) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Methodology sections ‘Data collection tools and procedure’ and ‘Data quality control’ describe a WHO-developed structured questionnaire, a standard data abstraction format, and pretesting. However, the study collected data from hospitalized patients, not outpatients, and our copy does not say its checklist was developed using the WHO AWaRe 2023 classification. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [5]Patel J Deshpande S. Assessment of antibiotic prescribing pattern using World Health Organization prescribing indicators in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Gujarat. Int J Pharm Sci Invent 2020; 9: 17– 22.
  2. [10]Demeke B Molla F Assen A, et al. Evaluation of drugs utilization pattern using WHO prescribing indicators in Ayder Referral Hospital, Northern Ethiopia. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2015; 6(2): 343– 347.
  3. [16]Gube A Gonfa R Tadesse T. Evaluation of antibiotic use in medical Ward of Fitche District Hospital, north Showa zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia. Adv Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2017; 6: 217.
  4. [21]Admassie E Begashaw B Hailu W. Assessment of drug use practices and completeness of prescriptions in Gondar University Teaching Referral Hospital. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2013; 4(1): 265– 275.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tadesse, T. Y., Molla, M., Yimer, Y. S., Tarekegn, B. S., & Kefale, B.
Affiliations
  • Debre Tabor University (ET)
  • Clinical Pharmacy Unit, Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia
  • Bahir Dar University (ET)
Corresponding author
Kefale, Belayneh
Venue
SAGE Open Medicine
Published
2022-01
Volume
10
Pages
20503121221096608-20503121221096608
ISSN
2050-3121 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285277142
Cited by
29
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SAGE Open Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
antibiotic prescribing patterns, hospitalized patients, WHO prescribing indicators, antibiotic stewardship, empirical antibiotic therapy, ceftriaxone, antimicrobial resistance, culture and sensitivity testing, rational drug use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review