Cited by 16Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsDiatoms and Algae ResearchGeology and Paleoclimatology Research

Siliceous algae response to the “Great Acceleration” of the mid-20th century in Crawford Lake (Ontario, Canada): A potential candidate for the Anthropocene GSSP

Open access
Gushulak, Cale AC, Marshall, Matthew, Cumming, Brian F, Llew-Williams, Brendan, Timothy Patterson, R, McCarthy, Francine MG·2022·The Anthropocene Review

Abstract

Diatom and chrysophyte assemblages from varved sediments of meromictic Crawford Lake, Ontario record major environmental changes resulting from spatially broadening anthropogenic environmental stressors related to the “Great Acceleration” in the mid-20th century. Biannual assessment of diatom and chrysophyte assemblages over the last ~200 years allowed for rate of change analysis between adjacent samples that increased substantially during the mid-20th century, concurrent with significant generalized additive model trends. Changes in diatom and chrysophyte assemblages were likely driven by multiple anthropogenic stressors including local forestry harvesting, agriculture, and milling activities, acidic deposition from regional industrial processes, and anthropogenic climate warming. Novel siliceous algal assemblages now exist in Crawford Lake, likely related to the complexities of the above mentioned local and regional stressors. The major assemblage changes at the proposed base of the Anthropocene Epoch detected in this study support the laminated sequence from Crawford Lake as a strong potential candidate for the Anthropocene GSSP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20530196211046036

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

  • Defining the Anthropocene

    Lewis, S. L., & Maslin, M. A. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14258 · Cited by 3,441 · cited 6× · see citing works

    “A rapid change at this time could support the varved sediment sequence from Crawford Lake as suitable for defining the onset of the Anthropocene Epoch (Lewis and Maslin, 2015; Subramanian, 2019b).”
    BackgroundInfluential

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gushulak, C. A., Marshall, M., Cumming, B. F., Llew-Williams, B., Timothy Patterson, R., & McCarthy, F. M.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Brock University (CA)
  • Carleton University, Canada
Corresponding author
Gushulak, Cale AC
Venue
The Anthropocene Review
Published
2021-09-18
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
571-590
ISSN
  • 2053-0196 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-020X
OpenAlex
W3200874300
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Anthropocene Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • NRCan Clean Technology ((#CGP-17-0704))
  • Haus der Kulturen der Welt
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Diatoms and Algae Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
Keywords
Great Acceleration, Anthropocene, Crawford Lake, diatoms, Chrysophyceae, varved sediments, meromictic lakes, acid deposition, agricultural impacts, milling, lake sediments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review